No abstract

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

More research is needed on the influence of family and economic strain as well as the effectiveness of assessments and interventions for depression in Mexican and Mexican American women, especially for those living in emerging Latina/o immigrant communities. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc, 2008; 14(3), 193-204. DOI: 10.1177/1078390308319034.

a b s t r a c tObjectives: This report presents up-to-date evidence and expert consensus-based revisions to the ASPMN 2011 guidelines that inform interprofessional clinical decision-making for hospitalized adults receiving opioid analgesics. Design: Systematic review of the literature. Methods: A 14-member expert panel was charged with reviewing and grading the strength of scientific evidence published in peer reviewed journals and revising the ASPMN 2011 existing guidelines. Panel members formulated recommendations based on the strength of evidence and reached consensus through discussion, reappraisal of evidence, and voting by majority when necessary. The American Society of Anesthesiologists evidence categories for grading and classifying the strength of the evidence were used. Recommendations were subjected to a critical review by ASPMN members as well as external reviews. Results: The 2011 guidelines were found to still be relevant to clinical practice, but new evidence substantiated refinement and more specific recommendations for electronic monitoring. The revised guidelines present risk factors divided into three categories: patient-specific, treatment-related, and environment of care. Specific recommendations for the use of electronic monitoring are delineated. Conclusions: All hospitalized patients that are administered opioids for acute pain are at risk of opioid induced advancing sedation and respiratory depression, but some patients are at high risk and require extra vigilance to prevent adverse events. All patients must be assessed for level of risk. Adaptations to the plan of care and monitoring strategies should be driven by iterative re-assessments according to level of risk.

Pain, in all probability, is the most common symptom experienced by individuals who interact with health care providers. It is understood as a complex and highly individual experience. This complexity is reflected in the paradoxical relationship between patient satisfaction and patient reported pain scores. Using a holistic, caring approach, nurses can optimize the effect of analgesia and facilitate comfort for the person living in pain. Caring for the patient in pain begins with heartfelt compassion and intention to help the person who is suffering. The author describes how the complex relationship and interchange between the patient and the holistic nurse explains the paradox.