Logical Modeling of Biological Systems 2014
DOI: 10.1002/9781119005223.ch5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ASP for Construction and Validation of Regulatory Biological Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, a short overview of Answer Set Programming (ASP) syntax and semantics is given (for an in-depth description see [ 28 30 ]). ASP is a form of declarative programming using logical semantics [ 29 ] which has been successfully applied to model biological networks [ 11 – 13 , 15 , 16 , 20 , 21 ]. An ASP program is a finite set of rules and looks very similar to a Prolog program.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this section, a short overview of Answer Set Programming (ASP) syntax and semantics is given (for an in-depth description see [ 28 30 ]). ASP is a form of declarative programming using logical semantics [ 29 ] which has been successfully applied to model biological networks [ 11 – 13 , 15 , 16 , 20 , 21 ]. An ASP program is a finite set of rules and looks very similar to a Prolog program.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rocca et al [ 21 ] proposed two possible routes to validate biological networks using different methods. The first method discussed uses the Boolean method to validate the consistency of the networks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If we execute the ASP program detailed above (lines [11][12][13][14][15][16][17], alongside with the description of the PH model given in Example 2 (lines 1-8), we obtain two answer sets that match the expected result:…”
Section: Example 3 (Fixed Points Enumeration)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the limitation of the method above is that the user has to decide upstream the number of computed steps that should be sufficient to reach all the goals. It is a main disadvantage which is shared for instance by the method proposed in [13]. One solution is then to use an incremental computation mode, which is especially tackled by the incremental solver of CLINGO [12].…”
Section: B Reachability Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%