ASIS&amp;T scholarly communication survey

Johnson, Margeaux; Roderer, Nancy K.

doi:10.1002/bult.2008.1720340505

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A survey jointly developed by ASIS&T and Blackwell in 2007 collected 581 responses and, in reviewing their findings, Johnson and Roderer (2008) found that 70% of respondents represented academic institutions and submitted their papers to peer-reviewed journals, with JASIS&T as their top choice. An overwhelming majority of the survey respondents (81%) read JASIS&T, and 34% reported reading every issue.…”

Section: Asisandt Publications: User Needsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Questions remain, however, on how ASIS&T publications might help to accomplish these goals and how to assess the achievement of these goals in the perceptions of ASIS&T users. Although several research studies in the past examined ASIS&T scholarly communication and the roles of specific ASIS&T publications (e.g., Case & Allard, 2004;Johnson & Roderer, 2008), there has been very limited research investigating users' needs regarding all ASIS&T publications or on user perceptions about how ASIS&T publications might be strategically aligned to serve both researchers and practitioners.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Needs assessment of ASIS&T publications: Bridging information research and practice

Tang

Mon

Beheshti

et al. 2016

Proc. Assoc. Info. Sci. Tech.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study reports the results of a 2016 online survey on perceptions and uses of ASIS&T publications. The 190 survey respondents represented 26 countries and 5 continents, with 77% of participants coming from academia rather than practitioners. Among the emerging themes were calls for a wider scope of research from information science to be reflected in the publications (including JASIS&T and the ASIS&T Proceedings), and ongoing challenges in the role of the Bulletin as a bridge between research and practice. The study provides insights into the scholarly publishing practices of the ASIS&T community and highlights key issues for the future direction of ASIS&T's scholarly communication.

show abstract

Section: Asisandt Publications: User Needsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Needs assessment of ASIS&T publications: Bridging information research and practice

Tang

Mon

Beheshti

et al. 2016

Proc. Assoc. Info. Sci. Tech.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The description of the survey results below makes some comparisons between the responses of ASIS&T members and the overall respondent population, but a more detailed analysis of the general survey results can be found in the last issue of the Bulletin . [1]…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

ASIS&T membership survey 2008: Responses from ASIS&T members

Johnson

Roderer

2008

Bul. Am. Soc. Info. Sci. Tech.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…We received 581 responses. For a detailed description of the survey and overall survey results, please refer to the ASIS&T Scholarly Communication Survey [1]. For a look at the survey results as they apply to ASIS&T members specifically, please see the ASIS&T Membership Survey 2008: Responses from ASIS&T Members [2].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%