1996
DOI: 10.1080/01292989609364741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asian media and elections: Frameworks in human rights and media systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is simply bad journalism, and, unfortunately, in many parts of the world, this is what the audience is accustomed to. What is regarded as a good story by the Asian media is probably not much different from what is regarded as a good story by their Western counterparts (Tay & George, 1996).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is simply bad journalism, and, unfortunately, in many parts of the world, this is what the audience is accustomed to. What is regarded as a good story by the Asian media is probably not much different from what is regarded as a good story by their Western counterparts (Tay & George, 1996).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Similarly, there is great diversity among the media systems of the region, ranging from the authoritarian systems of China, Myanmar, and Vietnam to the Western-style journalistic systems of India, Sri Lanka, and the Philippines (Tay & George, 1996). Such diversity makes it impossible for any consensus on defining Asian journalistic values.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discussion on development journalism, or what Loo labeled as 'compliant journalism' (p. 14) cannot be divorced from the idea of so-called 'Asian values' (see Hsiung, 1985;Tay & George, 1996;Wong, 2004), the elements of which include 'family above self, community above individual, constructive engagement as opposed to confrontation', and which rests on the 'consensusseeking instinct' (Wong, 2004, p.27). The governments in Southeast Asia that embrace the development journalism approach are, not surprisingly, also the ones that espouse the value of consensus as the core of national ideology.…”
Section: The Debate On Development Journalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the station’s top management has been cited as having difficulties defining what constitutes an ‘Asian perspective’, offering only that it is a perspective that comes from ‘knowing Asia intimately’ (Natarajan and Hao, 2003). Given the heterogeneity of the region and the diversity of the media systems present within it (Tay and George, 1996), it is hard, even among Asian countries, to reach a consensus on what this ‘Asian perspective’ might be. About a decade after its establishment, Channel NewsAsia spokesperson Han Chuan Quee (2008) attempted to sum up the definition of this concept, pointing out that Channel NewsAsia has been able to provide ‘Asian points of view to global developments’ by featuring, for example, the responses of different Asian countries to the US presidential elections in its newscasts.…”
Section: Channel Newsasia As Another ‘Al Jazeera’?: Establishing the Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%