2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2004.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aseptic discitis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a retrospective study of 14 cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
2
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
36
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequency of aseptic discitis in patients with AS is probably overestimated as a result of inclusion of degenerative lesions but also because of exclusion bias. The prevalence of destructive lesions varies between 1% and 28% (2,3). In spite of the findings in our patient, the positive predictive value of 18F-NaF PET for diagnosing spondyloarthritis or predicting a response to TNF antagonist therapy seems to be inconsistent (4).…”
Section: Radiological Vignettecontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…The frequency of aseptic discitis in patients with AS is probably overestimated as a result of inclusion of degenerative lesions but also because of exclusion bias. The prevalence of destructive lesions varies between 1% and 28% (2,3). In spite of the findings in our patient, the positive predictive value of 18F-NaF PET for diagnosing spondyloarthritis or predicting a response to TNF antagonist therapy seems to be inconsistent (4).…”
Section: Radiological Vignettecontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…In all these cases, consensus was obtained without difficulties by authors 1 and 5. A total of 60 papers were excluded after review; 27 as they dealt with specific LBP conditions ( Table 2) and 33 for other reasons: one review article [55], four case reports [7,27,129,148], one double publication [90], one of two studies reporting data from the same study sample [80], ten for evaluating signal changes other than those related to the endplate [6,20,51,53,71,113,116,139,146,150], and eight articles because they did not report the exact numbers needed to calculate the prevalence rates of VESC [4,10,109,110,114,122,133,141]. Finally, eight articles were excluded because the study samples were selected on the basis of the presence of VESC [41, 50,56,63,68,134,137,149].…”
Section: Review Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using these methods, spinal or sacroiliac joint inflammatory lesions (anterior spondylitis, spondylodiscitis or sacroiliitis, respectively) were evidenced in AS or SpA patients. For instance, enhancement of the contrast agent, gadolinium, was observed in the disc and the adjacent vertebral plates in spondylodiscitic lesions [17,18]. Dynamic MRI allows detection of early sacroiliitis in SpA patients in whom abnormalities are not revealed by conventional radiography [16].…”
Section: How To Assess the Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%