ASEAN-China Security Relations: Traditional and Non-Traditional Aspects

Abstract

Both ASEAN and China used the concept of Non-Traditional Security (NTS) in order to pursue security diplomacy in the Asia Pacific. For ASEAN, NTS is an area of security cooperation that allows it to drive the agenda of security architectures involving extra-regional powers such as the ASEAN Defense Ministerial Meeting Plus (ADMM+) and ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF). For China, NTS policy agenda allows it to gain acceptance among ASEAN member-states and an active role in the security agenda of ASEAN-led security architectures. The question that this article is pursuing is to what extent has ASEAN-China cooperation on NTS balanced between addressing the humanitarian aspect and the political objectives of security? This question is derived from the conceptual origin of NTS that stands on the importance of both the state and the individuals as the referent subjects of security. This article argues that ASEAN-China NTS cooperation emphasized more towards the strengthening of state’s capacity to deal with non-state actors’ transnational criminal activities, either for profit-seeking or subversive purposes. It is also apparent from evaluating the Memorandum of Understandings and Plans of Action between ASEAN and China that NTS cooperation is one China’s investments to engage a closer cooperation with ASEAN as well as a stronger presence in Southeast Asia’s strategic environment.

Feasibility Study on China-ASEAN Cooperation in the Forewarning Mechanism Against Telecom Fraud

“…Finally, only with China selflessly sharing its experience and drawing the blueprint for further action, ASEAN actively participating in the international forewarning mechanism against telecom fraud, could Southeast Asia curb the rampantness of cybercriminals and purify the world Internet environment. [17]…”

Paradox of Asean Way in Marine Plastic Pollution: The Challenge of Compliance Among Member States

“…Consequently, marine plastic pollution, not being immediately tied to economic consequences, has not been prioritized as an "emerging" issue. This leads to ASEAN environmental initiatives relying on voluntary cooperation, non-binding agreements, and weak institutional infrastructure, emphasizing aspirational policy statements and rhetoric over actual implementation (Wibisono 2017).…”

“…In this regard, establishing a supervisory body becomes essential to ensure success. To illustrate, the European model of regionalism emphasizes the pooling of sovereignty, while the ASEAN model prioritizes the maintenance of national sovereignty (Wibisono 2017). This distinction in their approach to sovereignty elucidates why environmental regionalism in Europe has been prosperous, whereas it has encountered challenges in Southeast Asia.…”

China and Regional Security in South and Southeast Asia: A Comparative Analysis of ASEAN and SAARC

“…Despite being created as an organization to counter the China threat, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has been engaging with China through dialogue and partnership. For instance, ASEAN and China have signed an Memorandum of Understanding to cooperate in non-traditional security (Wibisono, 2017). "While ASEAN's policy of 'honest brokerage' has allowed the presence of other powers to balance China, its policy of enmesh China has facilitated China's role as a stakeholder in the ASEAN processes" (Shekhar, 2012).…”