Abstract:1. One hundred and twenty 17-week-old Lohman Brown hens were divided into 4 groups. Groups 1 and 3 were given a diet with 180 g protein/kg and groups 2 and 4 were given a diet with 140 g protein/kg. Groups 1 and 2 were orally infected with 500 (+/- 50) embryonated Ascaridia galli eggs. 2. Marked differences in mean weekly weight gain for the 4 groups were observed. 3. Hens given 140 g protein/kg had a significant lower mean worm burden of adult A. galli worms and a significant lower weight gain compared to the… Show more
“…This indicates that the acute P. multocida infection had a negative effect on the egg production which is in accordance with previous observations (Campi et al, 1990). Infections with A. galli may decrease egg production in layers (Permin et al, 1998a); however, the missing effect observed in this study might be related to the relatively high age of chickens when infected (Kerr, 1955).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Weight gain was depressed in the group infected with P. multocida as a single infection and in the two groups additionally infected with A. galli either as a primary or secondary infection. Acute P. multocida infections are known to cause anorexia and subsequent weight depression as it has also been described for A. galli (Rhoades, 1964;Ikeme, 1971;Nagi et al, 1990;Permin et al, 1998a). The two double infected groups never reached a weight as high as the other groups, and at the end of the experiment especially the weight gain of the group ®rst infected with A. galli and subsequently with P. multocida was lower compared to all the other groups.…”
Pasteurella multocida and Ascaridia galli are observed with high prevalences in free range chickens in Denmark, but the impact is unknown. A study was carried out to examine the interaction between A. galli and P. multocida in chickens and the impact on production.Five groups, each with 20 18-week-old Lohmann Brown chickens were infected. Group 1 was orally infected with 1000 AE 50 embryonated A. galli eggs. Group 2 received 10 4 cfu P. multocida intratracheally. Group 3 was infected with A. galli and subsequently with P. multocida. Group 4 was infected with P. multocida followed by A. galli. Group 5 was the control. The study ran for 11 weeks where clinical manifestations, weight gain and egg production were recorded. Excretion of P. multocida was determined on individual basis and blood smears were made for differential counts. At the end of the study pathological lesions and the number of adult worms, larvae and eggs in the faeces were recorded.The birds were more severely affected when infected with both pathogens compared to single infections with A. galli or P. multocida, respectively. A lower weight gain and egg production was observed with dual infections. A. galli infection followed by a secondary P. multocida infection resulted in more birds with pathological lesions and continued P. multocida excretion.In conclusion a negative interaction between A. galli and P. multocida was observed and it is postulated that free range chickens are at higher risk of being subjected to outbreaks of fowl cholera when they are infected with A. galli. #
“…This indicates that the acute P. multocida infection had a negative effect on the egg production which is in accordance with previous observations (Campi et al, 1990). Infections with A. galli may decrease egg production in layers (Permin et al, 1998a); however, the missing effect observed in this study might be related to the relatively high age of chickens when infected (Kerr, 1955).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Weight gain was depressed in the group infected with P. multocida as a single infection and in the two groups additionally infected with A. galli either as a primary or secondary infection. Acute P. multocida infections are known to cause anorexia and subsequent weight depression as it has also been described for A. galli (Rhoades, 1964;Ikeme, 1971;Nagi et al, 1990;Permin et al, 1998a). The two double infected groups never reached a weight as high as the other groups, and at the end of the experiment especially the weight gain of the group ®rst infected with A. galli and subsequently with P. multocida was lower compared to all the other groups.…”
Pasteurella multocida and Ascaridia galli are observed with high prevalences in free range chickens in Denmark, but the impact is unknown. A study was carried out to examine the interaction between A. galli and P. multocida in chickens and the impact on production.Five groups, each with 20 18-week-old Lohmann Brown chickens were infected. Group 1 was orally infected with 1000 AE 50 embryonated A. galli eggs. Group 2 received 10 4 cfu P. multocida intratracheally. Group 3 was infected with A. galli and subsequently with P. multocida. Group 4 was infected with P. multocida followed by A. galli. Group 5 was the control. The study ran for 11 weeks where clinical manifestations, weight gain and egg production were recorded. Excretion of P. multocida was determined on individual basis and blood smears were made for differential counts. At the end of the study pathological lesions and the number of adult worms, larvae and eggs in the faeces were recorded.The birds were more severely affected when infected with both pathogens compared to single infections with A. galli or P. multocida, respectively. A lower weight gain and egg production was observed with dual infections. A. galli infection followed by a secondary P. multocida infection resulted in more birds with pathological lesions and continued P. multocida excretion.In conclusion a negative interaction between A. galli and P. multocida was observed and it is postulated that free range chickens are at higher risk of being subjected to outbreaks of fowl cholera when they are infected with A. galli. #
“…It has been proposed that worm infection may increase during the winter months if the litter becomes wet (Methling et al, 1994). Other suggested factors that may potentially influence worm burdens include stocking rate (Permin et al, 1998a), and/or the diet (Permin et al, 1998b), but we did not observe any clear patters in this respect. Although our results underline the complex infection dynamics of ascarid infections in laying hen flocks, it was confirmed that the magnitude of A. galli infection was not solely linked to whether the chickens had outdoor access or not.…”
“…This may be due to an unattractive range area because there is no overhead cover and because feed is provided indoors (Bubier and Bradshaw, 1998). This involves a considerable risk of welfare problems (Bestman and Wagenaar, 2003), leaching of nutrients to the ground water and parasitic infections (Permin et al, 1998 and1999). Moreover, the feeding strategies in organic egg production systems are widely based on purchased feed, synonymous with a huge import of nutrients to the system.…”
In many cases health and welfare problems are observed in organic egg production systems, as are high environmental risks related to nutrient leaching. These disadvantages might be reduced if the layers are allowed to utilise their ability to forage to a higher degree thereby reducing the import of nutrients into the system and stimulating the hens to perform a natural behaviour. However, very little is known about the ability of modern high-producing layers to take advantage of foraging to cover their nutritional needs, and the aim of the present work was to clarify this subject. Six flocks, each of 26 hens and one cock, were moved regularly in a rotation between different forage crops for a period of 130 days. Half of the flocks were fed typical layer feed for organic layers and half were fed whole wheat. The forage crops consisted of grass/clover, pea/vetch/oats, lupin and quinoa. At the beginning of the experiment, wheat-fed hens had a lower intake of supplementary feed (wheat) and a lower laying rate, egg weight and body weight. However, after a period of 6 to 7 weeks, the intake of wheat increased to approximately 100 g per hen per day and the laying rate increased to the same level as for the hens fed layer feed. For both groups of hens egg weight and body weight increased during the remaining part of the experiment. Crop analysis revealed different food preferences for hens fed layer feed and wheat-fed hens. Wheat-fed hens ate less of the cultivated seeds, whereas the amounts of plant material, oyster shells, insoluble grit stone and soil were larger in the crops from wheat-fed hens. Floor eggs were significantly more frequent in the hens fed layer feed, whereas wheat-fed hens only rarely laid floor eggs. Irrespective of treatment, hens were found to have excellent health and welfare. We conclude that nutrient-restricted, high-producing organic layers are capable of finding and utilising considerable amounts of different feed items from a cultivated foraging area without negative effects on their health and welfare.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.