As razões do baixo crescimento e os limites do governo Dilma

Corsi, Francisco Luiz

doi:10.36311/2014.978-85-7983-559-9.p257-274

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Classical Developmentalism and Its Crisis1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2022

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The FHC's administration started with a public debt of 23% out of the GDP, reaching in 1998 about 35% of the GDP (Sallum Júnior, 1999). Social inequality reached its peak and the minimum wage reached their lowest level in history since its creation, causing a situation of great instability (Corsi, 2014).…”

Section: Classical Developmentalism and Its Crisismentioning

confidence: 99%

Reflections on neo-developmentalism in the light of the Lula’s governments

Vaz¹,

Moraes

2022

RPD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since the mid-2000s, the maintenance of the orthodox macroeconomic regime of the Lula's governments surprised several intellectuals in the applied social sciences sector. What marks Lula's government, especially, are two characteristics: i) the economic growth with the commodities boom or the commodities super cycle, and ii) the fight against poverty. This second phenomenon propitiated for a group of intellectuals to formulate the thesis that Brazil would be in a process of "social developmentalism". On the other hand, a fraction of economists met to formulate a new theory, the "new developmentalism", criticizing the process of de-industrialization, debt crisis and external dependence that occurred in Brazil. These two theoretical currents formed what some academics called "neo-developmentalism". This article proposes to make a critical reflection and differentiation on the two currents.

show abstract

Section: Classical Developmentalism and Its Crisismentioning

confidence: 99%