SUMMARY:The dosing and quantification of acute renal replacement therapy has emerged as one of the most pressing issues in the management of critically-ill patients with acute kidney injury. Although there is ongoing debate as to the best marker of uraemic injury in this setting, several landmark studies have identified clearancerelated expressions of acute renal replacement therapy dose as important determinants of survival. Part 1 of this review examined the factors affecting the delivery of prescribed acute renal replacement therapy dose. Part 2 summarises and contextualises findings from recent dose-outcome studies, and reviews clinical tools to assist in the prescription and quantification of acute renal replacement therapy dose.KEY WORDS: extracorporeal circuit, haemodiafiltration, haemofiltration, renal replacement therapy, ultrafiltration, uraemia.
RELATING ARRT DOSE TO OUTCOMES IN THE CRITICALLY ILL
Intermittent haemodialysis-specific dose-outcome dataTo date, dose-outcome studies have been modality specific, although studies are underway that may allow recommendations to be directly extrapolated between acute renal replacement therapy (ARRT).A number of studies of intermittent haemodalysis (iHD) have attempted to link outcomes with small solute control or clearance. In the 1950s and 1960s, it was conclusively demonstrated during the Korean and Vietnam wars that iHD saved lives.1,2 Studies from that era also suggested improved outcomes when iHD was delivered either in an 'early' (initiated when blood urea nitrogen (BUN) < 100-150 mg/dL) or 'intensive' manner (treatments prescribed to maintain serum creatinine <5 mg/dL).3-5 The methodological shortcomings of these early experiences were rectified in a prospective interventional study, which examined outcomes in 17 matched pairs of critically-ill acute kidney injury (AKI) patients. 6 Patients were randomly assigned within each pair to receive a higher or lower dose of iHD. The higher dose which was defined as that required to maintain the predialysis BUN and serum creatinine at lower than 60 mg/dL and 5 mg/ dL, respectively, and the lower dose the converse of this. In general, 5-6 h of iHD per treatment was delivered, with the higher dose mostly requiring daily dialysis and the lower dose requiring alternate day dialysis. Treatments were performed using cellulosic dialysers and acetate buffered dialysate, and these are features which limit the generalisation of findings. Patients in each arm of the study were well matched. Disappointingly, there was 58% mortality in the high-dose group and 47% mortality in the low-dose group, a difference that was not statistically different.More recently, Schiffl et al. have examined outcomes in 160 critically-ill AKI patients. 7 Patients were assigned in alternating order to receive daily or alternate-day iHD. The higher dose group can be regarded as those who received daily iHD providing an average single-pool Kt/V of 0.92 delivered on average 6.2-fold per week, resulting in a time averaged BUN concentration of 60 mg/d...