“…Thus, children whose data were collected at 18 months of age (presented in table 2 of the article) [1], comprised an unknown proportion of those who were present at baseline, plus an unknown proportion of those who were not present at baseline. (v) The authors [1] found that children in the comparison group fared worse than children in the intervention group. Notwithstanding the methodological limitations compromising validity, they assumed this to mean that under natural circumstances, nutritional status of children would decline, and the intervention partially mitigated this.…”