2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial Neural Networks applied to estimate permeability, porosity and intrinsic attenuation using seismic attributes and well-log data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genetic algorithm represents parameters as an encoded binary string and works with the binary strings to minimize the cost, while the other works with the continuous parameters themselves to minimize the cost [13]. Genetic algorithms have had a great measure of success in search and optimization problems.…”
Section: The Principal Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Genetic algorithm represents parameters as an encoded binary string and works with the binary strings to minimize the cost, while the other works with the continuous parameters themselves to minimize the cost [13]. Genetic algorithms have had a great measure of success in search and optimization problems.…”
Section: The Principal Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This continuous genetic algorithm also has the advantage of requiring less storage than the binary genetic algorithm because a single number represents the variable instead of Nbits. The continuous genetic algorithm is inherently faster than the binary genetic algorithm, because the chromosomes do not have to be decoded prior to the evaluation of the cost function [13].…”
Section: The Principal Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Artificial neural networks (ANNs), which follow an empirical risk minimization of the training errors, are common form of learning machines that have been already considered. Different architectures of ANNs have been applied successfully for the prediction of lithofacies [ Chen and Rubin , ; Dubois et al ., ] or hydraulic properties in petroleum reservoirs [ Mohaghegh et al ., ; Wong et al ., ; Lee and Datta‐Gupta , ; Shokir et al ., ; Al‐Anazi et al ., ; Elshafei and Hamada , ; Kharrat et al ., ; Iturrarán‐Viveros and Parra , ] from cross hole or borehole geophysics data. However, despite their potential effectiveness, ANNs present some important drawbacks [ Camps‐Valls et al ., ]: (i) design and training often results in a complex, time‐consuming task, in which many parameters must be tuned; (ii) minimization of the training errors can lead to poor generalization performance; and (iii) performance can be degraded when working with small (sparse) data sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To predict Q −1 logs in the old wells, we used artificial neural networks (see Iturrarán-Viveros and Parra, 2014) and rock physical models to verify the attenuation anomalies. We used the Gamma test (Jones, 2004), a mathematically nonparametric and nonlinear smooth modeling tool, to estimate Q −1 by selecting the best combination of well logs (well 3) as inputs for the artificial NN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%