Artificial Intelligence in Various Medical Fields With Emphasis on Radiology: Statistical Evaluation of the Literature

Abstract

Background Artificial intelligence (AI) has significantly impacted numerous medical specialties with high emphasis on radiology. Associated novel diagnostic methods have become a rapidly emerging hot topic, and it is essential to provide insights into quantitative analysis of the growing literature. Purpose The purpose of this study is to highlight future academic trends, identify potential research gaps, and analyze scientific landscape of AI in the field of medicine. The main aim is to explore comprehensive dataset over a 46-year period in terms of publication type, publication citation, country of origin, institution, and medical specialty. Material and Methods The Web of Science database was searched from 1975 to 2020, and publications on AI were explored. Both original research reports and review articles were included in comprehensive bibliometric analysis. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and numerous variables were applied, namely year of publication, institution, type of publication, specialty area, country of origin, and citation numbers, and the Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance was used. Results A total of 117,974 relevant citations were retrieved, of which 83,979 original research and review articles were retained for analysis. Not surprisingly, the largest proportion of citations were from the United States (23%, n = 19,180) followed by China, Spain, England, and Germany. The number of citations was relatively consistent during the 1970s and emerging gradually during the 1980s. However, ongoing scientific trend positively evolved, and the numbers started to grow significantly in the 1990s and demonstrated continuous increasing wave since then. The most frequently represented key medical specialties were oncology, radiology, neuroradiology, and ophthalmology. Overall, no major statistical difference was found between these four domains (p = 0.753). Conclusions In summary, research on AI-powered technologies in the medical domain was at early stage in the 1970s. However, associated deep learning algorithms significantly attracted and revolutionized the scientific community with subsequent evolution of research and exponential growth of multidisciplinary publications since that time. Work in this field has impacted radiology as an area of predominant interest and has been led by institutions in the United States, Spain, France, China, and England. The bibliometric study reported herein can provide a broad overview and valuable guidance to help medical researchers gain insights into key points and trace the global trends regarding the status of AI research in medicine, particularly in radiology and other relevant multispecialty areas.

The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Head and Neck Cancers: A Multidisciplinary Survey

“…A high prevalence of AI use was also found among pathologists (71%). These findings are consistent with recently published studies in the literature [21,22] that reflect the suitability of AI tools for pattern recognition and feature classification, which are characteristics that relate most to diagnostic specialties [11]. According to correlation analysis, significant predictors of AI use were primary specialty (V = 0.455; p < 0.001), with radiology having the strongest association (p < 0.001), followed by young age (p < 0.007) and academic qualification.…”

“…This could suggest that AI remains a prerogative of the academic community and of younger generations that are more acquainted with digital technology. Among the 14 countries included, Northern European and Western countries had the highest prevalence of AI use, which may indicate a higher tendency for high-income countries to employ AI tools [21,[23][24][25].…”

Artificial intelligence in medicine: A comprehensive survey of medical doctor’s perspectives in Portugal

“…However, it is worth noting that in our study radiologists reported a higher inclination to adopt AI tools in their clinical practice compared to other medical specialties. While not present for all indicators assessed, this difference observed for radiologists aligns with the more established use of AI in this medical specialty compared to others [ 90 – 93 ].…”

Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating AI in Clinical Practice: A Scoping Evaluation

“…This is evident in the significant number of trials assessing video-based gastroenterology interventions, in contrast to the dominance of image-based radiology algorithms in academic literature and regulatory clearances. [29][30][31][32] This trend appears to be driven by a few groups that account for most video-based gastroenterology trials, indicating that the field of clinical AI trials is still relatively homogeneous in terms of investigators, trial design, and outcome measures. Systems using structured data such as EHRs and waveform data, on the other hand, have employed a mix of decision trees, neural networks, reinforcement learning, and other machine learning techniques.…”