Artificial intelligence in medicine: A comprehensive survey of medical doctor’s perspectives in Portugal

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly influential across various sectors, including healthcare, with the potential to revolutionize clinical practice. However, risks associated with AI adoption in medicine have also been identified. Despite the general understanding that AI will impact healthcare, studies that assess the perceptions of medical doctors about AI use in medicine are still scarce. We set out to survey the medical doctors licensed to practice medicine in Portugal about the impact, advantages, and disadvantages of AI adoption in clinical practice. We designed an observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study with a quantitative approach and developed an online survey which addressed the following aspects: impact on healthcare quality of the extraction and processing of health data via AI; delegation of clinical procedures on AI tools; perception of the impact of AI in clinical practice; perceived advantages of using AI in clinical practice; perceived disadvantages of using AI in clinical practice and predisposition to adopt AI in professional activity. Our sample was also subject to demographic, professional and digital use and proficiency characterization. We obtained 1013 valid, fully answered questionnaires (sample representativeness of 99%, confidence level (p< 0.01), for the total universe of medical doctors licensed to practice in Portugal). Our results reveal that, in general terms, the medical community surveyed is optimistic about AI use in medicine and are predisposed to adopt it while still aware of some disadvantages and challenges to AI use in healthcare. Most medical doctors surveyed are also convinced that AI should be part of medical formation. These findings contribute to facilitating the professional integration of AI in medical practice in Portugal, aiding the seamless integration of AI into clinical workflows by leveraging its perceived strengths according to healthcare professionals. This study identifies challenges such as gaps in medical curricula, which hinder the adoption of AI applications due to inadequate digital health training. Due to high professional integration in the healthcare sector, particularly within the European Union, our results are also relevant for other jurisdictions and across diverse healthcare systems.

Adoption of AI-Powered Chatbots with Large Language Models by Pathologists

“…Consistent with earlier studies, our research indicates that nearly half of the respondents have experimented with these AI programs (5, 6). The medical profession broadly anticipates incorporating AI into healthcare, acknowledging its prospective advantages while considering the inherent limitations and challenges (7, 8). According to a survey at a medical school, approximately 33% of the faculty used ChatGPT, mainly for creating multiple-choice questions (9).…”

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Patient Outcomes and Future of Healthcare Delivery in Cardiology: A Narrative Review of the Literature

“…In addition to optimizing efficiency, AI can assist in data analysis and pattern recognition within medical records, aiding clinicians in identifying trends, potential risk factors, and personalized treatment options. Overall, the integration of AI into medical record documentation promises to streamline administrative tasks, enhance data accuracy, and free up valuable time for healthcare professionals to focus on providing high-quality patient-centered care [42]. While the integration of AI in medical record documentation presents significant advantages, its implementation necessitates rigorous validation and continuous refinement to ensure the utmost accuracy, reliability, and compliance with regulatory standards.…”

With the Generalization of AI and Algorithms, Will We Still Need a Nephrologist in the Dialysis Room?

“…This quadrant includes tasks that are highly repetitive, require low cognitive skills, and have a low impact on patient outcome and can be performed by nonexpert personnel [14]. These tasks can be delegated to algorithms to reduce the workload of nephrologists and free up their time to focus on tasks that require more critical thinking and decision-making skills, such as administrative duties, generating reports, data entry, diet management, education, and other administrative responsibilities.…”

“…This quadrant represents tasks that involve complex interpersonal interactions or require human creativity, emotional intelligence, or judgment and cannot be fully automated in the near future. This might include tasks such as communicating with patients, providing emotional support, complex clinical decision-making, and vascular access management [5][6][7]14]. It is crucial to note that these classifications are not necessarily fixed and may change over time as technology continues to evolve.…”