2022
DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2022.840282
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial Intelligence Based Patient-Specific Preoperative Planning Algorithm for Total Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract: Previous studies have shown that the manufacturer’s default preoperative plans for total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific guides require frequent, time-consuming changes by the surgeon. Currently, no research has been done on predicting preoperative plans for orthopedic surgery using machine learning. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate whether artificial intelligence (AI) driven planning tools can create surgeon and patient-specific preoperative plans that require fewer changes by the surgeon. A dat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(40 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patient sex appears to contribute an important role in predicting TKA size Kunze [ 9 ] 31.2 ± 5.6 (13.7–59.8) 5306:6472 Machine learning 5 (stochastic gradient boosting, random forest, support vector machine, extreme gradient boosting, and elastic-net penalized logistic regression) Training set 80% Test set 20% XR Actual sizing from OR records Two large academic and three community centres Machine learning algorithms demonstrated good accuracy for predicting within one size of the final tibial and femoral components used for TKA. Patient height and sex were the most important factors for prediction femoral and tibial component size, respectively Lambrechts[ 2 ] NR NR Machine learning 3 (multi-task LASSO (MTL), LASSO, and group LASSO) Training set 70% Test set 30% MRI Actual sizing from OR records 39 experienced surgeons from 38 hospitals A machine learning-based preoperative plan, which captures surgical preferences in a patient- and surgeon-specific manner, has the potential to reduce the time needed to modify the preoperative plan prior to approval Burge [ 14 ] NR 33:45 Machine learning 1 (ML-based 2D–3D pipeline) Training set 90% Validation set 10% Test set (additional subjects 78) 44% XR & MRI Actual sizing from OR records Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) and KISTI Higher prediction accuracies than generally reported for manual templating techniques LoE Level of evidence, BMI Body mass index, ML Machine learning, and ( Y ) Years …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Patient sex appears to contribute an important role in predicting TKA size Kunze [ 9 ] 31.2 ± 5.6 (13.7–59.8) 5306:6472 Machine learning 5 (stochastic gradient boosting, random forest, support vector machine, extreme gradient boosting, and elastic-net penalized logistic regression) Training set 80% Test set 20% XR Actual sizing from OR records Two large academic and three community centres Machine learning algorithms demonstrated good accuracy for predicting within one size of the final tibial and femoral components used for TKA. Patient height and sex were the most important factors for prediction femoral and tibial component size, respectively Lambrechts[ 2 ] NR NR Machine learning 3 (multi-task LASSO (MTL), LASSO, and group LASSO) Training set 70% Test set 30% MRI Actual sizing from OR records 39 experienced surgeons from 38 hospitals A machine learning-based preoperative plan, which captures surgical preferences in a patient- and surgeon-specific manner, has the potential to reduce the time needed to modify the preoperative plan prior to approval Burge [ 14 ] NR 33:45 Machine learning 1 (ML-based 2D–3D pipeline) Training set 90% Validation set 10% Test set (additional subjects 78) 44% XR & MRI Actual sizing from OR records Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) and KISTI Higher prediction accuracies than generally reported for manual templating techniques LoE Level of evidence, BMI Body mass index, ML Machine learning, and ( Y ) Years …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lambrechts et al [ 2 ] tested the performance of ML models in the prediction of preoperative planning corrections for the femur–tibia joint interface. The ML models were validated on a dataset comprised of 5409 patients undergoing TKA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One growing trend in orthopaedic arthroplasty has been the use of patient specific implants, allowing for potentially superior outcomes, though involves more work during pre-operative planning ( 24 ). Lambrechts et al developed a novel application for ML in patient-specific joint replacement by using ML to automate patient- and surgeon-specific preoperative planning ( 25 ). Combining LASSO and SVM approaches, the AI-based preoperative plans were significantly improved as compared to the manufacturer's plans by requiring fewer manual corrections by the surgeon, thus streamlining the surgeons' preoperative workflow and reducing time needed to make corrections.…”
Section: Joint Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%