2019
DOI: 10.12788/j.sder.2019.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial intelligence and dermatology: opportunities, challenges, and future directions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AI was first coined at a famous Dartmouth College conference in 1956. [ 6 ] In the early 1970s, medical researchers discovered the applicability of AI in life sciences. [ 7 ] However, the limitation in technology also restricted the application of AI.…”
Section: History Of Artificial Intelligencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…AI was first coined at a famous Dartmouth College conference in 1956. [ 6 ] In the early 1970s, medical researchers discovered the applicability of AI in life sciences. [ 7 ] However, the limitation in technology also restricted the application of AI.…”
Section: History Of Artificial Intelligencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, artificial intelligence has made dramatic progress in its applications for image analysis in dermatology. [38][39][40][41][42] The improving performance of artificial intelligence models, therefore, can potentially be applied to improve TD processes. Though existing TD platforms can connect patients and referring physicians to dermatologists across geographic distances, these processes are still relatively time-and labor-intensive for dermatologists.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the training dataset should be balanced and minorities with regard to race, ethnicity, or socioeconomic status should be well represented. An example of racial bias is evident in a recent study by Esteva et al [30], which claimed that a particular AI algorithm was as accurate as a dermatologist in diagnosing skin malignancy; however, the dataset the researchers used consisted mostly of Caucasian skin samples, and as a result, the algorithm was inaccurate when used in non-Caucasian populations [31]. If the training data does not comprise a balanced population that includes patients from particular backgrounds, the prediction model will not be reliable for that group and can lead to misdiagnosis.…”
Section: Understanding the Inherent Biases Of Ai And Guarding Againstmentioning
confidence: 99%