2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artifacts Caused by Breast Tissue Markers in a Dedicated Cone-beam Breast CT in Comparison to Full-field Digital Mammography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study demonstrates that artifact size was dependent on the type of marker and its size. These results are consistent with a study by Wienbeck et al [37]. In an ex vivo study in a cone-beam breast CT, they found out that artifact size was also dependent on marker size in their study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our study demonstrates that artifact size was dependent on the type of marker and its size. These results are consistent with a study by Wienbeck et al [37]. In an ex vivo study in a cone-beam breast CT, they found out that artifact size was also dependent on marker size in their study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In our study, B-CT image quality was generally regarded as high, with negligible complaints resulting from known "ring" artifacts caused by the image reconstruction algorithm or those artifacts caused by postinterventional tissue markers. 10,19 Exceptionally low image quality ratings, which very rarely occurred, might be explained by movement artifacts or technical problems during data acquisition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the women presented a breast tissue marker to allow for comparison in terms of beam-hardening artifacts. A previous phantom study showed a significant effect of breast markers on image quality, and this factor should be considered when women with previous breast interventions undergo B-CT. 35 As the images are cross-sectional and can be evaluated using different planes, a longer reading time compared with mammograms is foreseeable. Nevertheless, optimization of image reconstruction has the potential to assist the radiologist for the depiction and characterization of breast lesions to expedite the reading process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%