1989
DOI: 10.1080/00221309.1989.9921120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artifact in the Hypnosis—Creativity Relationship

Abstract: Subjects who pretested high or low in hypnotic suggestibility took a creativity test either under hypnosis or in a waking state. All subjects made a global estimate of their general degree of creativity. Greater figural-spatial creativity was exhibited in the hypnosis condition than in the waking condition by both high and low suggestibles. Creativity self-reports were not corroborated by actual creative performance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S. Bowers, & van der Meulen, 1970;, P. G. Bowers, 1978Jackson & Gorassini, 1989;Perry, Wilder, & Appignanesi, 1973) suggesting high hypnotizable subjects tend to perform better on tests of creativity than less hypnotizable subjects. However, conclusions were not clear cut because of the mixed nature of results, complicated by the use of variety of different measures of creativity and definitions of creativity, leading Lynn and Sivec (1992) to conclude that "hypnotized individuals and nonhypnotized individuals cannot be reliably differentiated from one another on measures of creativity" (p. 328).…”
Section: Hypnotizability and Performance Onmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…S. Bowers, & van der Meulen, 1970;, P. G. Bowers, 1978Jackson & Gorassini, 1989;Perry, Wilder, & Appignanesi, 1973) suggesting high hypnotizable subjects tend to perform better on tests of creativity than less hypnotizable subjects. However, conclusions were not clear cut because of the mixed nature of results, complicated by the use of variety of different measures of creativity and definitions of creativity, leading Lynn and Sivec (1992) to conclude that "hypnotized individuals and nonhypnotized individuals cannot be reliably differentiated from one another on measures of creativity" (p. 328).…”
Section: Hypnotizability and Performance Onmentioning
confidence: 94%