2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2019.100921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Articulatory characterization of English liquid-final rimes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A reviewer proposes that the gesture under active control could in fact be the tongue mid lowering, and not dorsal retraction. This is certainly a possibility, and one that is consistent with the observation that tongue mid lowering is more measurable across different types of /l/, compared to dorsal retraction, as seen in our own data, and as discussed by Sproat and Fujimura (1993) and Proctor et al (2019). One hint that the effect of /l/-darkening on lateralization is not entirely mechanical comes from the timing of tongue mid lowering relative to lateralization peaks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A reviewer proposes that the gesture under active control could in fact be the tongue mid lowering, and not dorsal retraction. This is certainly a possibility, and one that is consistent with the observation that tongue mid lowering is more measurable across different types of /l/, compared to dorsal retraction, as seen in our own data, and as discussed by Sproat and Fujimura (1993) and Proctor et al (2019). One hint that the effect of /l/-darkening on lateralization is not entirely mechanical comes from the timing of tongue mid lowering relative to lateralization peaks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…While the theoretical emphasis in Sproat and Fujimura's work is on dorsal retraction, they justify measuring the temporal properties of tongue mid lowering with empirical ease, compared to measuring dorsal retraction. A similar observation follows from the data presented by Proctor et al (2019), who show that the /l/-darkening effect on tongue mid lowering can be larger than the effect of dorsal retraction.…”
Section: Lateralization As a Function Of /L/-darkeningsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…During the period where l-dors and the vowel overlap, the goal states for these gestures will be blended, with the relative contribution of each gesture dictated by its specified α value. A key finding of the study by Proctor et al (2018) is that GenAm laterals have a lower coarticulatory dominance than rhotics, which we interpret as corresponding to a lower specified blending strength ( α value) for laterals than rhotics. We suggest that the lower blending strength of the lateral enables l-dors to overlap with the vowel without significantly compromising contrasts in vowel quality.…”
Section: The Structure Of Rhymes With Postvocalic Liquidsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…For the gestural representation of GenAm liquids, we assume two coordinated lingual gestures, and in the case of onset rhotics, also a labial gesture. Following Proctor et al (2018), we posit a TT gesture and a TB gesture for GenAm rhotics and laterals. For the coronal articulation of /ɹ/, a glide-like TT gesture is specified for the constriction [Palatal] and constriction degree [Narrow] 5 .…”
Section: The Structure Of Rhymes With Postvocalic Liquidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation