2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhg.2004.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Articulations of rule: landowners, revolution, and territory in Chiapas, Mexico 1920–1962

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As Parenti argues, the role of the state in creating landed property is crucial; property rights are an abstraction that presupposes the territorial power of the state (Parenti, 2015: 835). However, landed property is a set of relations among actors (Bobrow-Strain, 2005), and it is a historically and geographically singular process that is deeply shaped by previous space configurations, as well as by the concrete articulations between different social groups and the state (Bobrow-Strain, 2003).…”
Section: The New Cycle Of Land Grabbing and The Theory Of Rentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Parenti argues, the role of the state in creating landed property is crucial; property rights are an abstraction that presupposes the territorial power of the state (Parenti, 2015: 835). However, landed property is a set of relations among actors (Bobrow-Strain, 2005), and it is a historically and geographically singular process that is deeply shaped by previous space configurations, as well as by the concrete articulations between different social groups and the state (Bobrow-Strain, 2003).…”
Section: The New Cycle Of Land Grabbing and The Theory Of Rentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precarious living conditions experienced by indigenous populationsin particular, lack of high quality land from which to meet subsistence needsallowed large latifundios 2 in both the Highlands and coastal coffee-growing regions to easily exploit indigenous labour (Bobrow-Strain, 2005;Collier & Quaratiello, 2005). It was a common practice at the time to coerce peasant labour through cash advances and strong arm tactics into signing labour contracts that for all practicable purposes placed them into positions of indentured servitude (Rus, 1994;Sanchez, Garza, Paz, & Ruiz, 1989).…”
Section: Migration History In Chiapasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was a common practice at the time to coerce peasant labour through cash advances and strong arm tactics into signing labour contracts that for all practicable purposes placed them into positions of indentured servitude (Rus, 1994;Sanchez, Garza, Paz, & Ruiz, 1989). Labour contracts allowed landowners to subject peasants to harsh working conditions with poor pay or risk imprisonment if they fled their employer (Bobrow-Strain, 2005;Rus, 1994). Labour contracts also typically stipulated that workers pay rent to their employers and purchase all their provisions in company stores (Sanchez et al, 1989).…”
Section: Migration History In Chiapasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sin embargo, no todos aquellos que exploran estas nuevas preguntas lo hacen desde una perspectiva foucaultiana. Aaron Bobrow-Strain se pregunta por nociones gramscianas de hegemonía en el Chiapas posrevolucionario 62 . Anne Mosher examina los esfuerzos de una compañía productora de acero por promocionar la adquisición de vivienda propia entre sus trabajadores con el fin de evitar la sindicalización 63 .…”
Section: Nuevas Direcciones (Década De 1980 Hasta Hoy)unclassified