1956
DOI: 10.1121/1.1908414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Articulation Reduction by Combined Distortions of Speech Waves

Abstract: Previous investigators have shown that speech waves can undergo any one of a number of severe forms of distortion in low ambient noise levels without serious reduction of word articulation. There are well-known notable exceptions (e.g., center clipping). However, it is not enough to avoid these exceptional forms of distortion. In the study reported here it has been demonstrated that combinations of speech-wave distortions, which individually are quite innocuous with regard to word articulation, can be devastat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1956
1956
1973
1973

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Speech can suffer progressive, severe at-IMPROVING SPEECH PERCEPTION FOR THE DEAF tenuation above 500 Hz without serious effect on its intelligibility for normals, as reported by Martin, Murphy, and Meyer (1956), but post-compression frequency equalization may nevertheless be important to the signal processing. Figure 2 shows that without treble•boost a significant portion of the compressed signal would remain below the subject's hearing threshold, assuming that lower-frequency elements were kept at comfortable levels, and it should be noted that above 2 kHz a 10-dB change of level for this subject is approximately equivalent, in its effect on loudness, to a 30-dB change for normals.…”
Section: B Gain Versus Input Amplitude and Frequencymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Speech can suffer progressive, severe at-IMPROVING SPEECH PERCEPTION FOR THE DEAF tenuation above 500 Hz without serious effect on its intelligibility for normals, as reported by Martin, Murphy, and Meyer (1956), but post-compression frequency equalization may nevertheless be important to the signal processing. Figure 2 shows that without treble•boost a significant portion of the compressed signal would remain below the subject's hearing threshold, assuming that lower-frequency elements were kept at comfortable levels, and it should be noted that above 2 kHz a 10-dB change of level for this subject is approximately equivalent, in its effect on loudness, to a 30-dB change for normals.…”
Section: B Gain Versus Input Amplitude and Frequencymentioning
confidence: 93%