2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2018.8593501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ArthroSLAM: Multi-Sensor Robust Visual Localization for Minimally Invasive Orthopedic Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding TP evaluation, our results indicate that CLAHS, LLAP and the proposed LLSH degrade TP of SIFT but significantly improve TP of SURF (87%,93% -LLSH). Importantly, it was shown that SIFT is unreliable in tracking long arthroscopic sequences [27] and also our results show improvement, TP using SIFT remains insufficient on such long datasets. All of the enhancement methods improve SURF from very poor to extraordinary TP, particularly when using the LLSH.…”
Section: B Feature Detection and Matching Performancementioning
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Regarding TP evaluation, our results indicate that CLAHS, LLAP and the proposed LLSH degrade TP of SIFT but significantly improve TP of SURF (87%,93% -LLSH). Importantly, it was shown that SIFT is unreliable in tracking long arthroscopic sequences [27] and also our results show improvement, TP using SIFT remains insufficient on such long datasets. All of the enhancement methods improve SURF from very poor to extraordinary TP, particularly when using the LLSH.…”
Section: B Feature Detection and Matching Performancementioning
confidence: 56%
“…Results showed that SIFT features could be best extracted and matched (compared to SURF and others) in knee-arthroscopy, but the study used only sequences containing six unrealistic images not representative of the complexity and length of the procedure. In later work, SIFT features proved to be insufficient for tracking due to the dynamic character (occlusions, blur, glare, deformation) of the environment [27]. To overcome that challenge, sensor-fusion using arthroscopic images, external camera and robot's odometry was employed to provide robust localisation for knee arthroscopy [27], [28].…”
Section: Surgical Visionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, our research group at the Queensland University of Technology (QUT) has made significant progress to circumvent these limitations [17]- [19]. Efforts to use Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) have recently been applied to arthroscopy, but the extraction of key landmark features from images still remains an open challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a cross validation experiment, the mean Dice coefficients for Femur, Tibia, ACL, and Meniscus are 0.78, 0.50, 0.41, 0.43 using the U-net and 0.79, 0.50, 0.51, 0.48 using the U-net++. This method represents the first step to improve our previously proposed medical robotic SLAM and depth mapping methods [17], [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%