Arthroscopic versus open bankart procedures: A comparison of early morbidity and complications

Green, Michael R.; Christensen, Kevin P.

doi:10.1016/s0749-8063(05)80308-1

Cited by 193 publications

(101 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Following open repair, pain, loss of movement, infection, failure of the implant, neurovascular injury and late degenerative joint disease are the more commonly encountered complications. 68,96 After arthroscopic stabilisation, neurovascular injury, [97][98][99] adhesive capsulitis 100 and synovial fistula 101 have all been encountered. Other complications are specific to the particular technique used to repair the Bankart lesion and include loosening, breakage and impingement after the use of staples; 102,103 injury to the suprascapular nerve and pain from the posterior knot after transglenoid repair; 101,104 foreign-body reaction, rapid decay leading to intra-articular dissociation of the head after repair with bioabsorbable tacks; 105,106 and pull-out after repair with suture anchors.…”

Section: Other Complications Of Surgical Stabilisationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Anterior instability of the shoulder after trauma

Robinson

Dobson

2004

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Other Complications Of Surgical Stabilisationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Anterior instability of the shoulder after trauma

Robinson

Dobson

2004

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…From 2003 to 2005, 71.2% of repairs were performed arthroscopically, compared with 87.7% from 2006 to 2008 [2]. With an increase in literature revealing similar clinical outcomes between patients undergoing open versus arthroscopic repair [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], there has been a recent shift towards arthroscopic stabilization as the first-line in surgical management of shoulder instability.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for the Management of Anterior Shoulder Instability: Indications and Outcomes

DeFroda

Bokshan

Stern

et al. 2017

Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of Review Arthroscopic Bankart repair is commonly utilized for shoulder stabilization in patients with anterior shoulder instability with minimum glenoid bone loss. The purpose of this review is to provide the indications, surgical technique, complications, and recent outcomes in arthroscopic Bankart repair for shoulder instability. Recent Findings Improvements in arthroscopic techniques have led to better patient outcomes, as well as an improved understanding of the pathoanatomy of instability. More recent studies have shown that one of the potential failures of primary arthroscopic repair may be due to unaddressed bone loss. This underscores the importance of evaluating glenoid bone loss and proper patient selection for this procedure to ensure successful outcome. Summary When indicated, arthroscopic stabilization is the treatment of choice for many surgeons due to its lower morbidity and low overall complication rate. Future work must focus on longer-term outcomes in patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair, as well as the clinical outcomes of new fixation techniques, augmentation techniques, and the effect of glenoid bone loss in outcome.

show abstract

“…Therefore, the surgical time is shorter with less morbidity, less postoperative pain, reduced hospitalization time, and a decreased risk of complications. 8 Moreover, some studies reported a minor loss of range of motion (ROM) in patients treated arthroscopically compared with those treated using an open procedure. 3,9 Few studies have prospectively evaluated the clinical results of traumatic anterior shoulder instability treated with either an open or arthroscopic procedure.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Open Bankart repair plus inferior capsular shift versus arthroscopic Bankart repair without augmentations for traumatic anterior shoulder instability: A prospective study

Uchiyama

Handa

Shimpuku

et al. 2017

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: Arthroscopic treatment of shoulder instability has some advantages (including short surgical time, less morbidity, less postoperative pain, reduced hospitalization time, and decreased risk of complications) compared with open procedures. We performed a prospective study comparing open repair with arthroscopic repair for recurrent anterior shoulder instability. The aim was to clarify the relative effectiveness of open Bankart repair plus inferior capsular shift (OBRICS) and arthroscopic Bankart (AB) repair without augmentations with approximately 5 years of follow-up. Methods: We investigated 32 shoulders of 30 patients (24 men and 6 women) undergoing OBRICS (15 shoulders of 17 patients; two patients were bilateral) and AB (15 shoulders of 15 patients). The average follow-up was 5 years and 2.5 months (range: 60-66 months). The clinical evaluation included recurrent instability rate, range of motion, and postoperative rehabilitation. All patients were assessed using the scoring systems of Rowe and the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) preoperatively and during the final evaluation. Results: Recurrent instability rates were significantly different between the OBRICS (0%) and AB (26.6%) groups (p ¼ 0.022). There were fewer limitations of external rotation (ER), ER at 90 abduction, and horizontal extension for AB than for OBRICS postoperatively (p < 0.05). The mean Rowe and UCLA scores for both methods were not significantly different at final follow-up. Conclusion: Our data suggest that OBRICS leads to a lower rate of recurrent instability. However, those with AB had fewer ER and horizontal extension limitations.

show abstract

Arthroscopic versus open bankart procedures: A comparison of early morbidity and complications

Cited by 193 publications

References 16 publications

Anterior instability of the shoulder after trauma

Anterior instability of the shoulder after trauma

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for the Management of Anterior Shoulder Instability: Indications and Outcomes

Open Bankart repair plus inferior capsular shift versus arthroscopic Bankart repair without augmentations for traumatic anterior shoulder instability: A prospective study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About