2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-4362.2002.01471.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arthropods and skin diseases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3). This pattern of skin reaction latency corresponds well to: (a) that observed for other insect allergens (Zhu & Stiller, 2002; Thomas et al , 2004; Bircher, 2005; Lehane, 2005); (b) the few published cases of decreases in latency from several days to an immediate response after controlled repeated exposure (Kemper, 1929; Usinger, 1966), as well as (c) anecdotal clinical and case reports of latency spanning periods of a few minutes up to 9 days in C. lectularius (Hase, 1917, 1929; Kemper, 1929; Hecht, 1930; Bartley & Harlan, 1974; Ryckman, 1985; Sansom et al , 1992; Stucki & Ludwig, 2008) and six other cimicid species (Hase, 1929; Usinger, 1966; Overal & Wingate, 1976). One person was insensitive to repeated bites by two cimicid species (Wendt, 1939, 1941).…”
Section: Proportion Of People Showing Skin Reactions (Pruritis Oedemsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3). This pattern of skin reaction latency corresponds well to: (a) that observed for other insect allergens (Zhu & Stiller, 2002; Thomas et al , 2004; Bircher, 2005; Lehane, 2005); (b) the few published cases of decreases in latency from several days to an immediate response after controlled repeated exposure (Kemper, 1929; Usinger, 1966), as well as (c) anecdotal clinical and case reports of latency spanning periods of a few minutes up to 9 days in C. lectularius (Hase, 1917, 1929; Kemper, 1929; Hecht, 1930; Bartley & Harlan, 1974; Ryckman, 1985; Sansom et al , 1992; Stucki & Ludwig, 2008) and six other cimicid species (Hase, 1929; Usinger, 1966; Overal & Wingate, 1976). One person was insensitive to repeated bites by two cimicid species (Wendt, 1939, 1941).…”
Section: Proportion Of People Showing Skin Reactions (Pruritis Oedemsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The volunteers in this study were students, staff and collaborators of the University of Sheffield, the authors themselves, and their relatives and friends (aged 15–64 years, median age 23 years). All volunteers were aware of the entire range of known clinical reactions (Ryckman & Bentley, 1979; Zhu & Stiller, 2002; Thomas et al , 2004) (Fig. 1) and gave informed consent to their participation in the feeding protocol (see ethical note).…”
Section: Proportion Of People Showing Skin Reactions (Pruritis Oedemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of authors have stated that the bites appear in groups of three, colloquially referred to as "breakfast, lunch, and dinner" (67,73,78,143,175,289,326). To date, the distribution of bites on patients has not been quantified or analyzed.…”
Section: Bed Bug Bite Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various cutaneous lesions (maculae, urticae, papules, vesicles, pustules, bullae, nodules, erosions and excoriations) could be observed in response to insect bites 3,4 . As these reactions are not highly specific for a particular arthropod and vary from one person to another, 5 the distinction from other cutaneous diseases might be difficult based on clinical grounds alone. Hence, a histologic examination may be of diagnostic help.…”
Section: Histopathologic Findings In Arthopod Bite Reactions Retrievementioning
confidence: 99%