2009
DOI: 10.5194/dwesd-2-51-2009
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arsenic in drinking water: not just a problem for Bangladesh

Abstract: Abstract. For more than a decade it has been known that shallow tube wells in Bangladesh are frequently contaminated with arsenic concentrations at a level that is harmful to human health. By now it is becoming clear that a disaster of an unheard magnitude is going on: the World Health Organization fears that in the near future 1 in every 10 adult deaths in Bangladesh will be caused by arsenic-related cancers. Other studies show that problems with arsenic in groundwater/drinking water occur in many more countr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was revealed that the residents of the area had been chronically exposed to high levels (above the permissible limit of the WHO/BIS) of As (67% of the total 222 samples collected) and Fe (77% of the total 222 samples collected), in comparison with the highly As-exposed populations of the adjoining regions like West Bengal, India (Mukherjee et al 2006;Nickson et al 2007) and Bangladesh Halem et al 2009). Again, the study also revealed that around 35.1% of the water sources of tubewells have an As contamination of more than the 0.05 ppm, which is higher (11.2%) than the previous report by Nickson et al (2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was revealed that the residents of the area had been chronically exposed to high levels (above the permissible limit of the WHO/BIS) of As (67% of the total 222 samples collected) and Fe (77% of the total 222 samples collected), in comparison with the highly As-exposed populations of the adjoining regions like West Bengal, India (Mukherjee et al 2006;Nickson et al 2007) and Bangladesh Halem et al 2009). Again, the study also revealed that around 35.1% of the water sources of tubewells have an As contamination of more than the 0.05 ppm, which is higher (11.2%) than the previous report by Nickson et al (2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In Bangladesh, 28-77 million people drink arsenic-contaminated water without having alternative resources. Chronic consumption of such toxic water, in the future, may lead to, according to the estimate of the World Health Organization (WHO), 1 in every 10 adult deaths caused by arsenic-related cancer (Ahmad et al 2003;Halem et al 2009, SOS-Arsenic, downloaded from http://www.sos-arsenic.net on 28 Feb 2010). Again, the permissible limit for As in drinking water, according to the WHO, is 0.01 ppm, which is similar to the specification laid down by the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS;BIS 1991;WHO 1993;Nickson et al 2007); however, in India, according to the BIS (1991), the maximum permissible limit in the absence of an alternate source is 0.05 ppm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its concentration in aquatic environment ranges from <0.1 to 100 g/L, with up to 850,000 g/L arsenic in mine drainages (Smedley and Kinniburgh, 2005). The World Health Organization estimated in 2001 that about 130 million people worldwide are exposed to groundwater with arsenic concentration above 50 g/L, including Bangladesh, India, China, and USA (van Halem et al, 2009). As compared to trace metals, the speciation of arsenic is more complicated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was revealed that the residents of the area had been chronically exposed to high levels (above the permissible limit of the WHO/BIS) of As and Fe in comparison with the highly As-exposed populations of the adjoining regions like West Bengal, India (Mukherjee et al 2006;Nickson et al 2007) and Bangladesh Halem et al 2009). This area is mainly within the quaternary alluvial basin (Ground Water Information Booklet 2008) bounded by the Himalayan Mountains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%