2010
DOI: 10.1063/1.3525984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Array of Josephson junctions with a nonsinusoidal current-phase relation as a model of the resistive transition of unconventional superconductors

Abstract: An array of resistively and capacitively shunted Josephson junctions with nonsinusoidal currentphase relation is considered for modelling the transition in high-T c superconductors. The emergence of higher harmonics, besides the simple sinusoid I c sin φ, is expected for dominant d-wave symmetry of the Cooper pairs, random distribution of potential drops, dirty grains, or nonstationary conditions. We show that additional cosine and sine terms act respectively by modulating the

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Arrays of Josephson junctions with well controlled parameters are a very active field of research. As well as being of interest in their own right, they are also being used to model complex phenomena as a tool to investigate the effects of disorder in granular films [48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60]. This work is aimed at investigating the role of disorder in granular superconductors with different intergrain coupling, due to the presence of either strong or weak links.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arrays of Josephson junctions with well controlled parameters are a very active field of research. As well as being of interest in their own right, they are also being used to model complex phenomena as a tool to investigate the effects of disorder in granular films [48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60]. This work is aimed at investigating the role of disorder in granular superconductors with different intergrain coupling, due to the presence of either strong or weak links.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 shows the comparison of the functions in Equations ( 8)- (10). Note that, for p = 1, Equation (9) becomes 4x(1 − x), i.e., Joglekar's function is four times the Strukov's function given by Equation (8), while, for p = 1, Prodromakis's function in Equation ( 10) is exactly the same as Strukov's function in Equation (8). The basic noticeable difference between these functions is the g max = g(x = 0.5) scaleability, where g max is the value of g(x) when x = 0.5.…”
Section: Memristor Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…thus representing the amount of charge required to move the boundary between the doped and the undoped regions from x = 0 to x = 1, and vice-versa. Memristor becomes an important concept in Physics and electronics for design and control of quantum memristor devices [7,8] which exhibit superconducting characteristics based on Josephson junction with quasiparticle tunneling. Following the discovery of TiO 2 memristor, another sprouted field of interest is the memristor modeling in SPICE useful for circuit simulations [9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, given the scope and scale of the world's future Emerging Energy Web needs, a technology with the capacity to have a significant impact necessarily involves vast quantities of material. Unconventional computational schemes, novel physical phenomena, materials and devices (see for example [67,68,66,69,70,71,72]) should be devised to improve the efficiency at the core of the Emerging Energy Web. Improvements of the energy performances at the microscopic level would then imply a scaling up at the higher levels of the future Emerging Energy Web.…”
Section: Micro-and Nano-scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%