2005
DOI: 10.4271/2005-08-0014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Array Designs Optimized for Both Low-Frequency NAH and High-Frequency Beamforming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The geometry has been optimized for minimum sidelobe level with DAS beamforming measurements up to 6 kHz as described in Ref. 4. This optimization guarantees a maximum ability of the array to distinguish plane waves incident from different directions.…”
Section: Array Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The geometry has been optimized for minimum sidelobe level with DAS beamforming measurements up to 6 kHz as described in Ref. 4. This optimization guarantees a maximum ability of the array to distinguish plane waves incident from different directions.…”
Section: Array Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some patch NAH methods, for example, the equivalent source method (ESM) 1 and statistically optimized near-field acoustical holography (SONAH), 2,3 can work with irregular microphone array geometries, but still require an average array-element spacing less than half the wavelength. As described by Hald,4 this allows the use of irregular arrays that are actually designed for use with beamforming. Typically, good performance with beamforming can be achieved up to frequencies where the average array interelement spacing is 2-3 wavelengths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improved algorithms significantly enhance the spatial resolution and remove the interference side-lobes by deconvolution of the array point spread function [14]. Since typically the focusing capabilities of beamforming methods require that all array microphones be exposed almost equally to any monopole on the source plane, the measurement distance between microphones and focusing points is usually required to be not smaller than the array diameter to keep the side-lobes at low levels [15]. As a consequence, the resolution of beamforming methods is limited to around one wavelength by Rayleigh criterion, which is poor at low frequencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main disadvantage of beamforming is the poor spatial resolution particularly at low frequencies. Additionally beamforming map is also suffers from the appearance of ghost sources due to side-lobe effects [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%