2017
DOI: 10.1002/ajim.22741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aromatic hydrocarbons and risk of skin cancer by anatomical site in 25 000 male offshore petroleum workers

Abstract: Our results support an association between exposure to crude oil or benzene and skin cancer risk on hands and forearms among offshore petroleum workers. Dermal uptake of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons or benzene may explain this association.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
1
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
16
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Excesses in skin cancer incidence and mortality among petroleum workers have previously been reported from Australia, Canada, Norway, and the United Kingdom, 6–10 and skin cancer in relation to occupational UVR exposure has recently received increased attention from both the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Labour Organization (ILO) 11 . We have previously shown that the majority of the skin cancers in Norwegian male offshore petroleum workers was related to UVR exposure and that associations with hydrocarbon exposure were restricted to the hands and forearms 12 . Due to a harsh climate and mandatory use of personal protective equipment (PPE), including helmet, glasses, gloves, coverall, and boots, workers are likely to experience little UVR exposure when on‐duty in the offshore work environment, with the exception of the pioneer era in the late 1960s and early 1970s 13–15 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Excesses in skin cancer incidence and mortality among petroleum workers have previously been reported from Australia, Canada, Norway, and the United Kingdom, 6–10 and skin cancer in relation to occupational UVR exposure has recently received increased attention from both the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Labour Organization (ILO) 11 . We have previously shown that the majority of the skin cancers in Norwegian male offshore petroleum workers was related to UVR exposure and that associations with hydrocarbon exposure were restricted to the hands and forearms 12 . Due to a harsh climate and mandatory use of personal protective equipment (PPE), including helmet, glasses, gloves, coverall, and boots, workers are likely to experience little UVR exposure when on‐duty in the offshore work environment, with the exception of the pioneer era in the late 1960s and early 1970s 13–15 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Technical workers include engineers, chemists and geologists where potential skin exposure to carcinogens is also of concern. For example, a 13·5‐year follow‐up study of 25 000 male offshore petroleum workers showed an increased risk of CM among workers ever exposed to crude oil or benzene 40 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach, as suggested by Kröger, would be to rank the different overlapping spells, and use the duration from the most relevant spell with respect to the exposure and disease in question to generate exposure duration for time periods with overlaps. For our recent paper on exposure to hydrocarbons and ionizing radiation in relation to skin cancer risk, we considered the ranking approach in the initial phase of data management. However, since we applied four different JEMs (benzene, crude oil, mineral oil, and ionizing radiation) to the work history data, a ranking approach would give priority to one exposure over the other when JEM ratings differed between overlapping spells of different job categories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study design and study population have been described in detail in previous publications on skin cancer risk associated with exposure to hydrocarbons, ionizing radiation, and ultraviolet radiation . In the present paper, we used the same case‐cohort data set of 1825 workers (including 182 skin cancer cases and 1643 subcohort members) with individual work history data (start year, stop year, job title).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%