1981
DOI: 10.21236/adb058174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Armor-Penetrator Performance Measures

Abstract: IS. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 19. KEY WORDS (Continue on reveree »Id» If necemmary and Identify by block number) space effectiveness armor quality factor mass effectiveness apparent density thickness equivalence residual penetration relative thickness relative areal mass 20. ABSTRACT (Continue on rarerem elm* It neceeeary and Identity by block number) / ^r g \ A review is presented of armor effectiveness measures as used in ballistics. Emphasis is placed on the fact that simple effectiveness measures attempt to desc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Honeycomb topologies are significantly more efficient at supporting stress than their equivalent relative density metal foams, and have been shown to be very effective at dissipating the energy of projectiles provided the area of the impact is large compared to the cell size (Frank 1981;Goldsmith & Louie 1995). They offer much less resistance if the projectiles do not interact with the webs in these structures.…”
Section: (C ) Hybrid Ballistic Latticesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Honeycomb topologies are significantly more efficient at supporting stress than their equivalent relative density metal foams, and have been shown to be very effective at dissipating the energy of projectiles provided the area of the impact is large compared to the cell size (Frank 1981;Goldsmith & Louie 1995). They offer much less resistance if the projectiles do not interact with the webs in these structures.…”
Section: (C ) Hybrid Ballistic Latticesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study by Madhu et al [38] examined the "ballistic performance" of 95% and 99.5% "alumina tiles" against a 12.7 mm AP projectile. As a function of the "ceramic thickness", and the "velocity of the projectile", a "ballistic efficiency factor (BEF)" was calculated based on Frank's work [39]. There was a higher ballistic performance for alumina 99.5% as compared to alumina 95%.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many variations and terminologies exist, but Frank [11 ] developed and described a concise set ofrnass and space effectiveness factors whose conventions are in use at ARL. The shaped charge tests in this paper are similar to standard depth of penetration tests, and the equivalent RHA performance of the titanium relative the semi-infinite penetration of the rod can be determined.…”
Section: Ballistic Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%