PsycEXTRA Dataset 1988
DOI: 10.1037/e532982009-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB): alternate forms reliability (Forms 8, 9, 10, and 11)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…ASVAB Forms 8 through 22 are content and topologically equivalent. Table 2 shows the ASVAB subtests and composites and their reliabilities, as computed using measures of internal consistency (Cronbach, 1952;Wherry & Gaylord, 1943) for the power tests or test-retest method for the two speeded subtests and the composites (Palmer, Hartke, Ree, Welsh, & Valentine, 1988). All test scores investigated were in the metric of the normative reference standard scores, which are based on a nationally representative sample of youth collected in 1980 (Maier & Sims, 1986;Ree & Wegner, 1990).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ASVAB Forms 8 through 22 are content and topologically equivalent. Table 2 shows the ASVAB subtests and composites and their reliabilities, as computed using measures of internal consistency (Cronbach, 1952;Wherry & Gaylord, 1943) for the power tests or test-retest method for the two speeded subtests and the composites (Palmer, Hartke, Ree, Welsh, & Valentine, 1988). All test scores investigated were in the metric of the normative reference standard scores, which are based on a nationally representative sample of youth collected in 1980 (Maier & Sims, 1986;Ree & Wegner, 1990).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is generally the case that scores based on assessments that use portfolio and constructedresponse formats tend to be less reliable, in part, because they have fewer exercises. For example, the reliability estimate for the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Test Battery 35-item word knowledge subtest is .89 (Palmer, Hartke, Ree, Welsh, and Valentine, 1988). If the word knowledge subtest had only 10 items, its estimated reliability would be .61.…”
Section: Internal Consistency Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ASVAB is both reliable (Palmer, Hartke, Ree, Welsh, & Valentine 1988) and valid (Wilbourn, Valentine, & Ree, 1984), and has been the subject of continuing research for more than 20 years (see, for example, Welsh et al, 1990). The intorcorrelations of ASVAB subtests were computed using the weighted normative sample, and g was estimated by the three methods.…”
Section: The Armed Services Vocation Aptitude Battf Ry (Asvab)mentioning
confidence: 99%