2003
DOI: 10.1108/01435120310486057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ARL’s Collection Analysis Project: continuing feasibility for a medium‐sized academic library

Abstract: Mabee Library at Washburn University, Topeka, USA, has just completed year two of a three-year strategic plan. One area of emphasis in 2002 was collection development. The library wanted to assess its current collection development strategy and review best practices to ensure it was keeping up with the needs of users and adequately addressing the impacts of digital information. The Association of Research Libraries' (ARL) Collection Analysis Project (CAP) was the chosen assessment tool, in part because of its … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Collection evaluations can be labour-intensive (Guise and Feinmark, 2003), time-consuming and expensive, but worth the investment (Henry, Longstaff, and Van Kampen, 2008). Libraries have adopted different approaches to evaluate their collections; often using quantitative tools such as WorldCat Collection Analysis (Henry, Longstaff, and Van Kampen, 2008;Ciszek and Young, 2010), even though some believe the adequacy of library collections cannot be stated in purely numerical terms (Clapp and Jordan, 1989).…”
Section: Evaluating Collectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collection evaluations can be labour-intensive (Guise and Feinmark, 2003), time-consuming and expensive, but worth the investment (Henry, Longstaff, and Van Kampen, 2008). Libraries have adopted different approaches to evaluate their collections; often using quantitative tools such as WorldCat Collection Analysis (Henry, Longstaff, and Van Kampen, 2008;Ciszek and Young, 2010), even though some believe the adequacy of library collections cannot be stated in purely numerical terms (Clapp and Jordan, 1989).…”
Section: Evaluating Collectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea for standardizing these elements and creating a template is partly based on ARL's Collection Analysis Project (CAP) methodology. The Association of Research Libraries developed the Collection Analysis Project (CAP) assisted self-study methodology to help academic libraries examine their collection development and management programmes in a systematic way (as described by Guise and Feinmark, 2003).…”
Section: The Templatementioning
confidence: 99%