2019
DOI: 10.1353/rvm.2019.0009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aristotle's Psychological Approach to the Idea of Luck

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Daniel Schillinger, for example, contends that for Aristotle (as for Thucydides and Machiavelli) “the idea of luck [τύχη] is a piece of ‘folk wisdom’ that arises only because of the limitations of human agency: when agents prove incapable of foreseeing and controlling significant events, then luck is invoked in order to describe what has happened” (Schillinger 2018, ii.) Schillinger sets out to demonstrate—following a line of argument that derives from Julia Annas and others—that “for Aristotle, the idea of luck [τύχη] refers to an explanation or an interpretation as opposed to a cause” (Schillinger 2018, 43; see Annas 1982, 319). On this “fictional” view, luck is something we ourselves project onto what is really going on; it is, at best, an epistemological category without ontological reality.…”
Section: Aristotle On Particularsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daniel Schillinger, for example, contends that for Aristotle (as for Thucydides and Machiavelli) “the idea of luck [τύχη] is a piece of ‘folk wisdom’ that arises only because of the limitations of human agency: when agents prove incapable of foreseeing and controlling significant events, then luck is invoked in order to describe what has happened” (Schillinger 2018, ii.) Schillinger sets out to demonstrate—following a line of argument that derives from Julia Annas and others—that “for Aristotle, the idea of luck [τύχη] refers to an explanation or an interpretation as opposed to a cause” (Schillinger 2018, 43; see Annas 1982, 319). On this “fictional” view, luck is something we ourselves project onto what is really going on; it is, at best, an epistemological category without ontological reality.…”
Section: Aristotle On Particularsmentioning
confidence: 99%