Mnemosyne, Vol. LIX, Fasc. 3 Also available online -www.brill.nl 1) Cet article a fait l'objet d'une présentation lors des Metageitnia organisés à Besançon en janvier 2004. J'aimerais remercier les personnes qui sont intervenues lors de ce colloque de même que le professeur P. Schubert (Genève), Dr. M. Steinrück (Fribourg) et Dr. P. Voelke (Lausanne) pour leurs remarques. Mais je tiens en particulier à remercier Mme A. Harder, professeure de l'Université de Groningen, pour avoir lu une version précédente de cet article. Ses nombreuses suggestions et encouragements m'ont fait progresser considérablement dans mes recherches. J'assume néanmoins l'entière responsabilité du contenu de cet article, et en particulier des erreurs qui pourraient subsister.
AbstractThis article sheds some new light on the often discussed problem of the end of Theocritus' fifth Idyll. By comparing this poem to other poetical contests, it can be shown that Theocritus associates the idea of weight to the replies of the speakers, using a structure similar to that found in other poetical contests, as for instance in the debate between Aeschylus and Euripides in Aristophanes' Frogs. In the comic play, the process of weighing the verses on a scale is made explicit, whereas in Theocritus it is not mentioned as such. The similarity of the setting, two poets confronting their answers, allows us, however, to compare the Aristophanean contest with the Theocritean. This article aims at explaining the reader's surprise when confronted with Theocritus' Idyll, rather than at providing another explanation for the abrupt end of the contest. The fifth Idyll could thus be taken as a kind of dialogue between the author and his audience, the latter being aware of the references used by Theocritus and of the additions made by him. We suggest that this poem is an enactment of Theocritus' poetical ideas through the attribution of the victory to the protagonist with the so-called lighter answers.