2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10682-019-10016-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arid environments select for larger seeds in pines (Pinus spp.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, we failed to detect any relationship between seed dormancy and mass, a somewhat surprising result, as larger seed size could be an alternative mechanism to dormancy to cope with unfavorable (dry) spells (Rubio de Casas et al 2017, Salazar‐Tortosa et al 2020, although see Jurado and Flores 2005, Norden et al 2009, Wyse and Dickie 2017). This result might be influenced by the relatively low seed size limit in our dataset (80% of seeds weighed between 0.001 and 0.1 g), which may have affected our power to detect trends related to seed size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Likewise, we failed to detect any relationship between seed dormancy and mass, a somewhat surprising result, as larger seed size could be an alternative mechanism to dormancy to cope with unfavorable (dry) spells (Rubio de Casas et al 2017, Salazar‐Tortosa et al 2020, although see Jurado and Flores 2005, Norden et al 2009, Wyse and Dickie 2017). This result might be influenced by the relatively low seed size limit in our dataset (80% of seeds weighed between 0.001 and 0.1 g), which may have affected our power to detect trends related to seed size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Likewise, we failed to detect any relationship between seed dormancy and mass, a somewhat surprising result, as larger seed size could be an alternative mechanism to dormancy to cope with unfavorable (dry) spells (Rubio de Casas et al 2017, Salazar-Tortosa et al 2020 Results for the phylogenetic logistic regression to evaluate the effect of seed functional traits and phylogeny on seed dormancy; seed dormancy was considered a binary variable (0 = non-dormant; 1 = dormant), dispersal syndrome had three states (anemochory, autochory, zoochory), dispersal seasons were considered to be six 2-month periods: onset rainy = November/December, mid-rainy = January/ February, rainy-to-dry season transition = March/April, onset dry = May/June, mid-dry = July/August, dry-to-rainy season transition = September/October. The degree of phylogenetic correlation in the data was a = 1.5.…”
Section: The Evolutionary Ecology Of Seed Dormancy In the Cerradomentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Our finding of an among‐species competition–colonisation trade‐off supports and quantifies previously held theories about species life histories and is indicative of alternative strategies within wind‐dispersed pines whereby, in high‐light conditions, larger‐seeded species have high establishment success and seedling biomass, while smaller‐seeded species have high dispersal and seedling RGR. The comparatively high tolerance of seedlings from larger‐seeded species to environmental stress, particularly drought, is thought to be advantageous in more arid habitats (Salazar‐Tortosa et al., 2020), while the high RGR of smaller‐seeded pines has been suggested as an explanation for their greater ability to spread and colonise new open habitats compared to the larger‐seeded species (Grotkopp & Rejmánek, 2007; Grotkopp et al., 2002; Rejmánek & Richardson, 1996). One way around the constraints imposed by a trade‐off between seed mass and terminal velocity in pines is primary or secondary dispersal by animals, which can allow high dispersal distances of large seeds with reduction in investment in both the diaspore wing and the size of the cones required to house these structures (Benkman, 1995; Salazar‐Tortosa et al., 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparatively high tolerance of seedlings from larger-seeded species to environmental stress, particularly drought, is thought to be advantageous in more arid habitats (Salazar-Tortosa et al, 2020), while the high RGR of smaller-seeded pines has been suggested as an explanation for their greater ability to spread and colonise new open habitats compared to the larger-seeded species (Grotkopp & Rejmánek, 2007;Grotkopp et al, 2002;Rejmánek & Richardson, 1996). One way around the constraints imposed by a trade-off between seed mass and terminal velocity in pines is primary or secondary dispersal by animals, which can allow high dispersal distances of large seeds with reduction in investment in both the diaspore wing and the size of the cones required to house these structures (Benkman, 1995;Salazar-Tortosa et al, 2020). For example, P. coulteri, the largest-seeded species examined here, can be secondarily dispersed by seed-rodents in its native range (Borchet et al, while in other species animal dispersal may be the primary dispersal mechanism with the diaspore wing either completely absent (e.g.…”
Section: Strong Evidence Of An Among-species Competition-colonisation...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We predicted that the freeze treatment would result in reduced plant survival and reproduction, compared to the control, due to overwinter damage to plant structures (Lubbe and Henry, 2019a, 2019b, 2020). Furthermore, we predicted that the freeze treatment would lead to fewer flowers and seeds (Inouye, 2008), but increased allocation to larger seeds (i.e., greater mass), if plants are cued by freezing stress to expect harsher environmental conditions, which may favor larger seeds (Salazar‐Tortosa et al, 2020). We predicted that the late addition treatment would delay the onset of the growing season, leading to less time for photosynthesis and lower allocation to reproduction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%