2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-39387-2_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Argumentation-Based Reasoning with Preferences

Abstract: Abstract. One of the main objectives of AI is modelling human reasoning. Since preference information is an indispensable component of common-sense reasoning, the two should be studied in tandem. Argumentation is an established branch of AI dedicated to this task. In this paper, we study how argumentation with preferences models human intuition behind a particular decision making scenario concerning reasoning with rules and preferences. To this end, we present an example of a common-sense reasoning problem com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fusing commonsense knowledge into Argumentation with strict definitions will empower the Explainability capability of an AF because it will allow it to reason with methods closer to human thinking and therefore being more persuasive in a dialogue. The studies that attempt to fuse commonsense knowledge into Argumentation Theory consider commonsense knowledge as: commonly accepted knowledge on which they use preferences (Čyras 2016), text analytics (Moens 2016; Zhang et al . 2017), Event Calculus (Almpani & Stefaneas 2017), and even knowledge from external Web Knowledge Graphs (Kobbe et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fusing commonsense knowledge into Argumentation with strict definitions will empower the Explainability capability of an AF because it will allow it to reason with methods closer to human thinking and therefore being more persuasive in a dialogue. The studies that attempt to fuse commonsense knowledge into Argumentation Theory consider commonsense knowledge as: commonly accepted knowledge on which they use preferences (Čyras 2016), text analytics (Moens 2016; Zhang et al . 2017), Event Calculus (Almpani & Stefaneas 2017), and even knowledge from external Web Knowledge Graphs (Kobbe et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This way, it becomes possible to both to take advantage of the progress in sub-fields of Computational Argumentation, as well as to identify new areas that require research, particularly suitable for the needs of commonsense reasoning. Other studies approach commonsense reasoning with AF using preference rules [3], Event Calculus [1], and Web resources [7], without explicitly distinguishing commonsense from other types of knowledge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several works generalizing Dung's framework to handle preferences over arguments have been proposed Cayrol 1998, 2002;Vesic 2011, 2014;Cyras 2016;Silva, Sá, and Alcântara 2020). Definition 1.…”
Section: Preference-based Afmentioning
confidence: 99%