Argumentation and Emotional Processes in Group Decision-Making: Illustration of a Multilevel Interaction Process Analysis Approach

Abstract

Given the importance of group decision-making for organizations, small group research finds itself challenged to contribute to a better understanding and management of the underlying processes. A multi-level interaction process analysis is presented considering group decisionmaking as a social interaction process. In an illustrative case study, the deliberation of a jury dramatized in the film 'Twelve Angry Men' is analyzed. The interactions are coded at the behavioral level using the Conference Coding System, distinguishing task-oriented, socialemotional and procedural aspects of social interaction. At the content level, the focus is on critical incidents in information exchange, looking for argumentational turning points, and critical points in decision-making. Different data analysis strategies are used to study the interaction process at the behavioral and content level and their interdependence. The results are interpreted in the context of different theories on group decision-making and several heuristic hypotheses about the process dynamics of group decision-making are derived.keywords group decision-making, group information processing, interaction process analysis

Emotional Dynamics and Strategizing Processes: A Study of Strategic Conversations in Top Team Meetings

“…Jarzabkowski, 2005;Jarzabkowski and Seidl, 2008;Sturdy et al, 2006). Second, we examined existing coding guides for top management team and other team interactions (Beck and Fisch, 2000;Currall et al, 1999). Examples of strategic practices from these sources included initiating an issue, proposing, counter proposing, elaborating, seeking and giving information, giving a specific suggestion, voting, agreeing, rejecting, selecting and deselecting a proposal.…”

Dealing with the Unexpected: Critical Incidents in the LEGO Mindstorms team

“…A focus on critical incidents can be a useful way of managing great volumes of qualitative research data (Angelides, 2001). While other scholars have focused on critical incidents in psychotherapy (Flanagan, 1954), marketing (Gabbott & Hogg, 1996), and supervision (Fukuyama, 1994), the technique has indirectly been drawn into the study of teams through Beck and Fisch's (2000) study of information exchange. Incidents are not characterized as 'critical' due to their drama or sensationalism; rather their criticality is based on the justification, the significance, and meaning given to them by participants, and typically can only be recognized as critical after the consequences of the incident are known (Angelides, 2001).…”

The process of team communication in multi-cultural contexts: An empirical study using Bales’ interaction process analysis (IPA)

“…In particular, there is still a lack of empirical evidence on factors that may facilitate or hinder the effectiveness of multi-cultural team interaction process (McLeod et al, 1996;Watson et al, 1993), as well as characteristics of the underlying interaction process in team decision-making (Beck and Fisch, 2000). Because a team's outcome in a problem solving context depends largely on the nature of the interaction of the team, communication and its processes are important to study in small group settings, which in turn provides 2.…”