2012
DOI: 10.1515/lexi.2012-0004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Argument structure and text genre: cross-corpus evaluation of the distributional characteristics of argument structure realizations

Abstract: Argument structure and text genre: cross-corpus evaluation of the distributional characteristics of argument structure realizations 1.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the results were as follows (cf. Engelberg et al 2012): -While some verbs hardly show any cross-corpus differences with respect to the distribution of argument realization patterns, other verbs differ widely across corpora, that is, across register and medium. -Often particular stylistic properties attached to registers account for the distribution of argument realization patterns, that is, the tendency to employ many passives and few addressee datives in scientific texts is the result of a tendency for impersonal descriptions in scientific texts.…”
Section: Influences Of Registermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Some of the results were as follows (cf. Engelberg et al 2012): -While some verbs hardly show any cross-corpus differences with respect to the distribution of argument realization patterns, other verbs differ widely across corpora, that is, across register and medium. -Often particular stylistic properties attached to registers account for the distribution of argument realization patterns, that is, the tendency to employ many passives and few addressee datives in scientific texts is the result of a tendency for impersonal descriptions in scientific texts.…”
Section: Influences Of Registermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roland and Jurafsky (1998) and Roland (2001) attribute influences of this sort to the preference of particular kinds of discourse for particular verb senses, which, in turn, are associated with different argument structures. Some more recent studies have also been able to show the extent to which the distribution of argument structure patterns is influenced by register and by the distinction between spoken and written language (Gries 2011;Engelberg et al 2012). To the degree that discourse frequencies govern the degree of entrenchment of a linguistic entity, the dependency of frequencies on genre raises the question of whether entrenchment is a notion that is to be understood relative to particular communicative situations, such as writing a letter, giving a talk, or having a chat on the phone.…”
Section: Quantitative Corpus Studies On Argument Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…En el módulo 3 se especifica la información sintagmática mediante los datos basados en la frecuencia empírica acerca de cada argumento y sus características morfosintácticas y semánticas 17 (cf. Engelberg et alii 2012, Engelberg 2015a, a la vez que se ofrece un posible equivalente en la lengua de contacto para cada acepción. La detallada información semántica, funcional y morfosintáctica relacionada con cada argumento 18 proporciona los matices específicos en los que se basan muchas de las divergencias léxicas a nivel inter-e intralingual y a los cuales se les presta especial atención 19 .…”
Section: Figura 4: Subcampos Conceptuales 2º Grado (Scc G2 ) Y Lexicaunclassified