1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf01245391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Area-averaged vegetative cover fraction estimated from satellite data

Abstract: The relationship was analysed between the vegetation cover factor expressed as a percentage and the area-averaged normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). On selected days the NDVI was calculated from channel 1 and 2 reflectance data of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA-11) satellite's advanced very high-resolution radiometer (AVHRR) for five test areas under agricultural and forestry use. No ground-based reflectance measurements could be made for validation of these data. Therefo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
73
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sea surface temperature was derived from NOAA/NASA Pathfinder Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) SST imagery. Vegetation abundance was specified as a function of the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) contained in imagery from the VEGETATION instrument onboard the SPOT satellite platform, following relations established by Wittich and Hansing [1995] and Gutman and Ignatov [1998].…”
Section: Description Of the Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sea surface temperature was derived from NOAA/NASA Pathfinder Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) SST imagery. Vegetation abundance was specified as a function of the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) contained in imagery from the VEGETATION instrument onboard the SPOT satellite platform, following relations established by Wittich and Hansing [1995] and Gutman and Ignatov [1998].…”
Section: Description Of the Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SMA with fixed or variable endmembers has been used for the estimation of FVC in various environments including arid/semi-arid regions [21][22][23][24] and at scales from regional to global [25][26][27][28]. For grassland, linear SMA models with two endmembers (vegetation and non-vegetation) or three endmembers (live grass, senesced grass and soil) are effective in estimating endmember fractions due to their simplicity and interpretability [2][3][4]13,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NDVI max is set as 0.86 for all sites here. Because the scattering coefficients for the leaves and the soil, the leaf-area index, the leaf angle distribution, and the angle of incident radiation affect the NDVI, the vegetation cover problem becomes more complex [13]. The errors in EF estimation caused by the uncertainty of f c will be discussed in Section 4.2.…”
Section: Fractional Vegetation Cover F Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is advantageous to develop ET models that completely depend on surface parameters/variables retrieved from remote sensing. Surface parameters/variables that can be extracted from remotely sensed data mainly include surface temperature, surface emissivity, albedo, vegetation indices, leaf area index, soil moisture, net radiation, solar radiation, and air temperature [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Some simple methods can estimate surface energy fluxes by directly using these remotely sensed surface parameters/variables (e.g., empirical equations and the triangle feature space [23][24][25][26][27][28]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%