2015
DOI: 10.1080/03634523.2015.1090005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are You Satisfied? Exploring the Mediating Effects of Mentoring Communication Strategies in Predicting Chinese International Graduate Students’ Program Satisfaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study finds that, besides persistence, resilience, and resources, the agency to communicate, termed as agentic communication, along with listening in the negotiation between students and their supervisors, is evident as a core component in supporting or undermining a successful PhD over time. This is consistent with other research evidence on the importance of communication in cross-cultural educational settings (e.g., Yang et al, 2015), but this study highlights the effectiveness of agentic communication in making or breaking the rapport, trust, and respect in the most significant relationship in an individual's multi-worlds during the PhD abroad.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study finds that, besides persistence, resilience, and resources, the agency to communicate, termed as agentic communication, along with listening in the negotiation between students and their supervisors, is evident as a core component in supporting or undermining a successful PhD over time. This is consistent with other research evidence on the importance of communication in cross-cultural educational settings (e.g., Yang et al, 2015), but this study highlights the effectiveness of agentic communication in making or breaking the rapport, trust, and respect in the most significant relationship in an individual's multi-worlds during the PhD abroad.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…With fine and distinct differences between each of the six patterns, students and their supervisors' agency in communication and the effectiveness of this communication are evident as core components in facilitating or undermining transitions across the multi-worlds over time. Drawing on previous research that identifies the importance of communication for international students (Ai, 2017;Cortazzi & Jin, 1997;Gareis, Merkin, & Goldman, 2011;Holmes, 2005;Ngwira, Mapoma, Hong, Sariyo, & Kondowe, 2015;Williams, 2005;Yang, Dunleavy, & Phillips, 2015), this study finds communication can make or break the rapport, trust, and respect between a supervisor and an international doctoral student, the key relationship to facilitate or to constrain a successful doctorate in STEM fields (Halse & Malfroy, 2010;Lee, 2008;Robertson, 2017). Pertaining to this crucial point, the focus of the discussion below is the importance of bilateral effort in exercising agency to initiate and enhance communication, or what could be termed as agentic communication.…”
Section: Congruence/difference and Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional services that students can experience are counseling, mentorship, and employment support. Studies show that the quality of these services can determine satisfaction with overall university experience (Clemes et al, 2008;Yang et al, 2016). Yang and others (2016) find that mentorship programs help students' socialization and their ability to gain academic support, both of which are important for their success at the university.…”
Section: Hypotheses Satisfaction With the University Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is less technically profound than other psychological constructs, a factor that carries tremendous weight and credibility with students is their personal satisfaction with their educational experiences (Hardré & Hackett, 2015c). Previous research has linked satisfaction with the academic program to other variables, such as teaching and learning strategies used by faculty (e.g., Choi, 2016;Svinicki, 2004); mentoring style and communication (e.g., Orellan, Darden, Perez, & Salinas, 2016;Yang, Dunleavy, & Phillips, 2016); and disciplinary culture (e.g., Bair, Haworth, & Sandforth, 2004;Lovitts, 2001). Graduate students' perceptions of the quality of their academic programs influence their integration into their academic programs and relationships with faculty (Solem, Hopwood, & Schlemper, 2011), which can, in turn, influence their academic effort and attitudes (Sun & Richardson, 2012).…”
Section: Satisfaction With Graduate Experience and Academic Programmentioning
confidence: 99%