“Are we talking just a bit of water out of bank? Or is it Armageddon?” Front line perspectives on transitioning to probabilistic fluvial flood forecasts in England

Abstract

Abstract. By showing the uncertainty surrounding a prediction, probabilistic forecasts can give an earlier indication of potential upcoming floods, increasing the amount of time available to prepare. However, making a decision based on probabilistic information is challenging. As part of the UK-wide policy's move towards forecast-based flood risk management, the Environment Agency (EA), responsible for managing risks of flooding in England, is transitioning towards the use of probabilistic fluvial forecasts for flood early warning. While science and decision-making are both individually progressing, there is still a lack of an ideal framework for the incorporation of new and probabilistic science into decision-making practices, and, respectively, the uptake of decision-makers' perspectives in the design of scientific practice. To address this, interviews were carried out with EA decision-makers (i.e. Duty Officers), key players in the EA's flood warning decision-making process, to understand how they perceive this transition might impact on their decision-making. The interviews highlight the complex landscape in which EA Duty Officers operate and the breadth of factors that inform their decisions, in addition to the forecast. Although EA Duty Officers already account for uncertainty and communicate their confidence in the forecast they currently use, the interviews revealed a decision-making process which is still very binary and linear to an extent, which appears at odds with probabilistic forecasting. Based on the interview results, we make recommendations to support a successful transition to probabilistic forecasting for flood early warning in England. These recommendations include the new system's co-design together with Duty Officers, the preparation of clear guidelines on how probabilistic forecast should be used for decision-making in practice, EA communication with all players in the decision-making chain (internal and external) that this transition will become operational practice and the documentation of this transition to help other institutes yet to face a similar challenge. We believe that this paper is of wide interest for a range of sectors at the intersection between geoscience and society. A glossary of technical terms is highlighted by asterisks in the text and included in Appendix A.

Challenges in modeling and predicting floods and droughts: A review

“…For hydraulic design, frequency estimates are often communicated with uncertainty bounds related to sampling uncertainty. However, ensemble forecasts and predictions are not always well understood (Pagano et al, 2014) and decision-making based on probabilistic information is challenging (Arnal et al, 2020).…”

“…1. Obtain stakeholder feedback: We may improve communication strategies by learning about a user's perception of model output (Ramos, Mathevet, Thielen, & Pappenberger, 2010) and by engaging in a dialogue with key players in the decision making process (Addor et al, 2015;Arnal et al, 2020) and public agencies and engineers who develop prediction and modeling tools for operational application. 2.…”

“…There is a need to develop clear guidelines of how probabilistic forecasts and future projections are to be used in decision making in combination with subjective expertise (Arnal et al, 2020;Pagano et al, 2014). As an alternative to expressing uncertainties in terms of probabilities, the storyline approach has recently been proposed (Clark, Wilby, et al, 2016;Shepherd et al, 2018) to communicate uncertainties of (future) projections at longer timescales.…”

OpenForecast v2: Development and Benchmarking of the First National-Scale Operational Runoff Forecasting System in Russia

“…The low interest in runoff forecasts can be, to some extent, attributed to the weak communication skills of the hydrologists who develop the service. There are only a few papers (e.g., [50,75]) that put their central focus on communication rather than computational issues. Thus, hydrologists know how to compute forecasts but do not know how to communicate them efficiently.…”

Flood forecasting using quantitative precipitation forecasts and hydrological modeling in the Sebeya catchment, Rwanda

“…Flood forecasting in Africa has not received the needed attention in the literature, in spite of the recognized importance of the topic. Although a number of authors (Haile et al 2016;Siddique & Mejia 2017;Huang 2018;Arnal et al 2020;Wenyan et al 2020) have demonstrated the benefit of ensemble forecasts over deterministic forecasts. However, most of the studies that used ensemble forecasting have focused on forecasting for lead times of up to 15 days rather than short-time forecasting (Cloke & Pappenberger 2009;Pagano et al 2014;Emerton et al 2016;Wu et al 2020).…”