2010
DOI: 10.1080/17439760.2010.534105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are we looking for positivity or similarity in a partner's outlook on life? Similarity predicts perceptions of social attractiveness and relationship quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the main predictors of whether a person likes another person is similarity ( Byrne & Nelson, 1965 ). The so-called similarity hypothesis has received a lot of support with regard to personality traits such as optimism in romantic relationships ( Böhm, Schütz, Rentzsch, Körner, & Funke, 2010 ), personality and physical attractiveness in roommate relationships ( Carli, Ganley, & Pierce-Otay, 1991 ), humor style in married couples ( Hahn & Campbell, 2016 ), gender-role self-concept and selection of dating partners ( Morell, Twillman, & Sullaway, 1989 ), socially undesirable traits such as Machiavellianism ( Ináncsi, Láng, & Bereczkei, 2016 ), and same-sex friendships regardless of duration or closeness ( Morry, 2005 ). The meta-analytic effect of interpersonal attraction and perceived similarity was estimated to be r = .39 ( Montoya, Horton, & Kirchner, 2008 ).…”
Section: Perceivers' Traits In Relation To Targets' Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the main predictors of whether a person likes another person is similarity ( Byrne & Nelson, 1965 ). The so-called similarity hypothesis has received a lot of support with regard to personality traits such as optimism in romantic relationships ( Böhm, Schütz, Rentzsch, Körner, & Funke, 2010 ), personality and physical attractiveness in roommate relationships ( Carli, Ganley, & Pierce-Otay, 1991 ), humor style in married couples ( Hahn & Campbell, 2016 ), gender-role self-concept and selection of dating partners ( Morell, Twillman, & Sullaway, 1989 ), socially undesirable traits such as Machiavellianism ( Ináncsi, Láng, & Bereczkei, 2016 ), and same-sex friendships regardless of duration or closeness ( Morry, 2005 ). The meta-analytic effect of interpersonal attraction and perceived similarity was estimated to be r = .39 ( Montoya, Horton, & Kirchner, 2008 ).…”
Section: Perceivers' Traits In Relation To Targets' Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of these models, we hypothesized that liking would be a function of people's own trait self-control and the trait self-control described in the vignettes, a tendency that has been observed for optimism ( Böhm et al, 2010 ). Specifically, we derived the following competing hypotheses:…”
Section: Perceivers' Traits In Relation To Targets' Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve this paradox, people low in CSE might exploit cognitive bias to justify the reality (i.e., having a less CORE SELF-EVALUATION MODERATES DISTINCTIVE SIMILARITY PREFERENCE similar or even dissimilar partner) to fit their expectations (i.e., having a highly similar partner; Lemay & Clark, 2015). In other words, they could, consciously or unconsciously, "see" their partners to share their distinctive characteristics, even though their partners do not possess these characteristics in reality, and this cognitive strategy is likely to help people to be happier in their relationships (Böhm, Schütz, Rentzsch, Körner, & Funke, 2010). Future studies could explore how people with different levels of CSE form and maintain their relationships in reality.…”
Section: Cse Moderates Distinctive Profile Similarity Preferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One aspect of respect is the way in which a person handles differences between people. Even though numerous findings have revealed that people are romantically more attracted to people who are highly similar to them (Böhm, Schütz, Rentzsch, Körner, & Funke, 2010;O'Rourke, Claxton, Chou, Smith, & Hadjistavropoulos, 2011), further literature demonstrated that there are many ways to strengthen a healthy partnership despite the partner's impactful differences. Differences can include differences such as personality, behavior, lifestyle, gender, age, culture, and unique preferences.…”
Section: Respect (Respect For Differences)mentioning
confidence: 99%