Are We Getting Less Sexist? A Ten-Year Gap Comparison Analysis of Sexism in a Portuguese Sample

Abstract

Widely and slowly, discrimination against women based upon gender has become socially unacceptable. However, less is known about how sexist beliefs have progressed in the last years and if we are responding to this social antagonizing of a sexist discourse. Our goal was to verify the existence of differences in ambivalent sexism and neosexism over a ten-year gap in a Portuguese adult sample and to assess possible modifications in the relationship between the variables. A cross-sectional, correlational study was conducted using two independent groups, with measures taken in 2009 and then in 2019. Both groups were invariant in terms of average age and proportion of sexes. Our results show a decrease in hostile and benevolent forms of sexism, while neosexism remains constant. The relationships between variables suggest that sexist beliefs are changing to accommodate subtler and modernized forms of sexism, like neosexism, that deny the existence of discrimination against women, resent discrimination complaints, and maintain a paternalistic view of women. Neosexism also seems to have a stronger correlation with hostile sexism than with benevolent forms of sexism in the male subsample. This relationship is stronger for the 2019 sample. These relationships suggest that sexism is more deeply rooted than we would like to admit and adapts to social discourse. Despite our best efforts, it is yet to be overcome.

Abortion Attitudes: An Overview of Demographic and Ideological Differences

“…Indeed, legislation over a woman's right to choose has recently been—or is currently being—discussed in countries across the globe including Australia (Kallios, 2021), Ecuador (Daniels, 2019), Germany (Sanyal, 2020), Mexico (BBC News, 2020), New Zealand (Little, 2020), Northern Ireland (McCormack, 2021), Poland (Pronczuk, 2020), and the United States (Borger, 2020). Yet there is a surprising paucity of research examining why women's reproductive rights remain divisive despite important, albeit gradual, strides toward gender equality in other areas (e.g., see England et al, 2020; Gomes et al, 2022; Huang et al, 2019). A comprehensive examination of the demographic and ideological correlates of abortion attitudes is therefore needed to advance understanding of an enduring—and hotly contested—issue that is central to the women's rights movement.…”

Gender Matters: Exploring the Mental Health of Youth Experiencing Homelessness in Canada

“…"In almost every encounter, human beings produce gender, behaving in the ways they learned were appropriate for their gender status" (Lorber, 1994, p.32). However, what is 'appropriate' has created avenues for discrimination (Balik et al, 2020;Gomes et al, 2021) and gendered health disparities (Barrett & White, 2002;Bryant et al, 2009;Gazendam et al, 2020;Laster Pirtle & McIssac et al, 2023;Wright, 2021).…”

O efeito do tipo de mulher na categorização social inicial e na atribuição de características estereotípicas

“…Com uma amostra norte-americana, Haines et al (2016) não observaram grandes mudanças nestes estereótipos entre 1983 e 2014. Em Portugal, apesar das políticas de igualdade e das alterações nos papéis de género, não se observam alterações nas atitudes sexistas (Gomes et al, 2021). No Brasil, África do Sul e Índia, as mulheres relatam ainda viverem em uma sociedade onde são categorizadas por múltiplos estereótipos, sendo pressionadas a se comportarem e se vestirem conforme os papéis tradicionais (Unstereotype Alliance, 2018).…”