1992
DOI: 10.1097/00132586-199204000-00065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Two (Inexperienced) Heads Better Than One (Experienced) Head? Averaging House Officers?? Prognostic Judgments for Critically Ill Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Makridakis and Winkler (1983), as well as Winkler and Makridakis (1983), increased the accuracy of time series predictions by averaging across different forecasting models. In a study on medical decision making, Poses, Bekes, Winkler, Scott, and Copare (1990) found that when predicting patients' mortality risk, averaging across the opinions of rather inexperienced physicians (junior house officers in British hospitals) led to better estimates than the assessments of individual experienced physicians, even though the individual predictions of the inexperienced physicians were worse than those of the experienced ones. When forecasting the number of advertising pages sold by a news magazine, Hubbard Ashton and Ashton (1985) found that most of the improvement in accuracy is achieved by a simple average across three opinions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Makridakis and Winkler (1983), as well as Winkler and Makridakis (1983), increased the accuracy of time series predictions by averaging across different forecasting models. In a study on medical decision making, Poses, Bekes, Winkler, Scott, and Copare (1990) found that when predicting patients' mortality risk, averaging across the opinions of rather inexperienced physicians (junior house officers in British hospitals) led to better estimates than the assessments of individual experienced physicians, even though the individual predictions of the inexperienced physicians were worse than those of the experienced ones. When forecasting the number of advertising pages sold by a news magazine, Hubbard Ashton and Ashton (1985) found that most of the improvement in accuracy is achieved by a simple average across three opinions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With increasing experience, expert clinicians' cue weights should become more similar to one another. However, there is evidence that cue weights inferred from responses to paper cases vary widely among both novices and experts (Poses et al, 1990;Slovic, Rorer, & Hoffman, 1971;Wigton et al, 1986b). Further, the patterns are such that it is unlikely these differences are only the result of intersubstitution of imperfectly correlated cues (vicarious functioning).…”
Section: Variation In Physicians' Judgement Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interview-based qualitative study was then conducted to identify what is important to physician trainees in ICU and infer on positive educational experiences for physician trainees. This study may help experts assemble more efficient learning environments, training programs and teaching strategies, like the use of narratives, more coherent with the day-to-day realities and lifeworlds of critical care physician trainees (Fins and Nilson 2000;Poses et al 1990). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%