Are third-party green–brown ratings believed?: The role of prior brand loyalty and environmental concern

Abstract

This study shows the role of consumers' prior brand loyalty and environmental concern in their responses to third-party green-brown ratings of a brand. The online quasi-experiment with a national sample of U.S. consumers revealed that the validity of third-party green-brown ratings is believed equally between consumers with high and low environmental concern, but the impact of the ratings on brand greenness perception was greater among consumers with high (vs. low) environmental concern. This study also shows that consumers who are loyal to a brand are more likely to accept the validity of the brand's green rating than that of its brown rating. Further, loyal consumers deny the relevance of the brown rating to the brand's greenness. These findings suggest biased assimilation of third-party green-brown rating information as a function of the consumer's prior brand loyalty and environmental concern. We discuss the theoretical and managerial implications of the findings.

Impact of Consumer Environmental Responsibility on Green Consumption Behavior in China: The Role of Environmental Concern and Price Sensitivity

“…Second, this study proposes an important mechanism to explain the positive effect of consumers' environmental responsibility on green consumption intention, which specifically reveals that environmental concerns act as an important bridge in promoting green consumption. The result is consistent with many previous studies, which reveal that environmental concerns play a mediating role in green consumption [20,73,74]; however, the mediating effect of environmental concern between environmental responsibility and green consumption intention has not been fully discussed. Third, this study contributes to past studies by investigating the moderating role of price sensitivity in green consumption.…”

Demystifying deliberate counterfeit purchase behaviour: towards a unified conceptual framework

“…Marketing researchers provide evidence of such efforts to maintain cognitive consistency in a wide range of contexts, including ethical decision-making by marketing managers (Fraedrich and Ferrell, 1992), consumer response to relationship marketing (Sheth and Parvatiyar, 1995) and experiential marketing (Schmitt, 1999), negative online reviews (Sen and Lerman, 2007) and word-of-mouth communications (De Matos and Rossi, 2008), role of leaders in internal marketing (Wieseke et al, 2009), cause-related marketing (Edmondson and Lafferty, 2014) environmental concerns (Kwon, Englis and Mann, 2015) and even counterfeit purchase behavior (Jirotmontree, 2013;Wilcox et al, 2009). Wilcox et al (2009) argue that consumers are guided by their desire to maximize the consistency between the products they consume and their central beliefs, attitudes, and values (Snyder and DeBono, 1985).…”

Analysis of the relationship between attitudinal factors and the intention to purchase remanufactured products

“…It is closely linked to environmentally responsible purchasing behaviour, although the strength of the relationships varies according to sample type and the particular product category at issue (Schlegelmilch, Bohlen, & Diamantopoulos, 1996). Over time, this factor has proved to be an important in consumers' buying decisions (Kwon, Englis, & Mann, 2016). According to Yeung (2004), this attribute "can represent people's concerns, likes and dislikes about the environment".…”