Are spatial planning objectives reflected in the evolution of urban landscape patterns? A framework for the evaluation of spatial planning outcomes

Abstract

Abstract:The evaluation of spatial planning results, or outcomes, has been rather neglected by scholars and practitioners. The causes of this neglect are linked to the characteristics of the planning systems in use or difficulties in quantifying results. To advance the state of the art of outcome evaluation, this paper focuses on assessing the implementation of national spatial planning objectives in urban landscapes, through the use of an evaluation framework that makes use of spatially explicit information. The framework is built on four dimensions which reflect the main domains of spatial planning: efficient built-up development, conservation of agricultural land, landscape preservation, and human perception. Indicators capable of capturing landscape changes in both time and space are used to verify degree of conformance between adopted objectives and actual development patterns. We make use of spatially explicit data and assess whether and where landscape changes occurred, by integrating the framework into a multi-criteria analysis. In the present study, the framework is tested in two study areas in Switzerland and Romania, and the results are interpreted from the perspective of spatial planning approaches in the two countries. The efficiency and utility of the framework is demonstrated by its ability to provide valuable information facilitating improvement in the performance of planning processes, such as identifying where the implementation of objectives is less effective, and the domains of spatial planning that are affected. Our findings highlight that the distance between objectives and outcomes can be attributed to differences in countries' spatial planning approaches, particularly regarding landscape preservation and management. Our study provides valuable insights for the integration of time series of spatial data into the evaluation procedure.Key words: planning evaluation; spatial planning objectives; urban landscape; spatial multi-criteria analysis; romania; switzerland. Highlights:Preprints ( Peer-reviewed version available at Sustainability 2017, 9, 1279; doi:10.3390/su9081279 2• We propose a framework to verify conformance between planning intentions and outcomes • Planning objectives are partially reflected in land change patterns• The distance between intentions and outcomes is attributed to national planning approaches• Results show the efficiency and utility of the framework in a case study analysis

Towards a better understanding of land conversion at the urban-rural interface: planning intentions and the effectiveness of growth management

“…A more generalized understanding of the effects of institutional factors on land-use change is, however, a prerequisite to transfer knowledge on effective growthmanagement approaches. There is, thus, a need for more international comparative research that reflects the specific political, social or cultural context of the successful management of urban expansion (see e.g., Grădinaru, Iojă, Pătru-Stupariu and Hersperger (2017) and Pagliarin (2018)). Against this background, the analytical model of "regional governance capacities" has been proven useful in empirical studies (see Dang, Visseren-Hamakers and Arts (2016)).…”

The quality and implementation of local plans: An integrated evaluation

“…The conformance approach generally considers plans as blueprints, with their provisions eventually reflected in actual spatial development (Laurian et al, 2004;Mastop and Faludi, 1997;Talen, 1997). Consequently, this approach assumes that plans are successfully implemented if (1) their policies are executed (Lyles et al, 2016) and/or (2) if outcomes on the ground correspond to plan provisions (Alexander and Faludi, 1989;Gra˘dinaru et al, 2017;Loh, 2011;Oliveira and Pinho, 2010;Talen, 1996). Recently, Lyles et al (2016) suggested using the term conformance when assessing whether policies are carried out, the term influence when assessing whether a plan is used in decision-making and performance when addressing whether a plan influences outcomes.…”

Multi-Criteria Analyses of Urban Planning for City Expansion: A Case Study of Zamora, Spain

“…Different planning activities should be supervised to ensure they comply with the objectives, which leads to the development of different methodologies on this topic [10].…”