2019
DOI: 10.1177/1089268019880891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Social Media Ruining Our Lives? A Review of Meta-Analytic Evidence

Abstract: A growing number of studies have examined the psychological corollaries of using social networking sites (SNSs) such as Facebook, Instagram, or Twitter (often called social media). The interdisciplinary research area and conflicting evidence from primary studies complicate the assessment of current scholarly knowledge in this field of high public attention. We review meta-analytic evidence on three hotly debated topics regarding the effects of SNSs: well-being, academic achievement, and narcissism. Meta-analys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
106
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
(166 reference statements)
4
106
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Across meta-analyses published to date, researchers have documented a statistically significant negative association between social media usage and well-being [77,[110][111][112], a finding that is consistent with the experimental work reviewed in the text as well as several recent systematic reviews of the literature [4,6,35]. The size of this meta-analytic effect is small.…”
Section: Box 1 the Jingle-jangle Problemsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Across meta-analyses published to date, researchers have documented a statistically significant negative association between social media usage and well-being [77,[110][111][112], a finding that is consistent with the experimental work reviewed in the text as well as several recent systematic reviews of the literature [4,6,35]. The size of this meta-analytic effect is small.…”
Section: Box 1 the Jingle-jangle Problemsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The size of this meta-analytic effect is small. One review estimated that overall social media use explains 1% of the variance in well-being [6]. However, the results of two recently published meta-analyses add important nuance to this finding.…”
Section: Box 1 the Jingle-jangle Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Extending prior work (Appel, Marker, & Gnambs, 2019;Orben, 2020), this study synthesized the fast-growing-yet conceptually and empirically fragmented-literature on CMC, social media, and MH with a meta-review. We contribute to the literature twofold:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If, in this way, social media changes the surface form of activities more than the functions they fulfill, we would not expect consistent negative or positive effects on well-being. This account is supported by a number of studies and reviews that find null effects or only small effect sizes (M. Appel et al, 2019;Coyne et al, 2020;e.g., meta-analytic r = -.07, Huang, 2017;Jensen et al, 2019; of social media use on well-being, as well as by multiple studies that examine the direction of this association. Although it has often been argued that social media make people lonelier, more depressed, and less satisfied with their life (e.g., Kross et al, 2013;Twenge et al, 2018;Twenge & Campbell, 2019), it could also be that lonely, depressed, and unhappy people (or people who are simply more introverted) are more likely to self-select into using social media as a means of forming new relationships, finding communities that provide social support, and coping with negative affect (e.g., Fergie et al, 2016;Gowen et al, 2012;K.…”
Section: Potential Positive or Null Effectsmentioning
confidence: 76%