2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2139787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Sequential Trials Really Better than Unitary Trials?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the same way, the New York law encourages judges to separate liability and damages issues into sequential proceedings in any action for personal injury. More precisely, it presumptively assigns the determination of liability to the first stage and determination of damages to the second stage, unless the court orders otherwise (De Mot et al, 2013). 3 Overall, sequential trials are common in antitrust 1 We use the pronon 'she' to refer to the lawyer and 'he' to refer to the client.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the same way, the New York law encourages judges to separate liability and damages issues into sequential proceedings in any action for personal injury. More precisely, it presumptively assigns the determination of liability to the first stage and determination of damages to the second stage, unless the court orders otherwise (De Mot et al, 2013). 3 Overall, sequential trials are common in antitrust 1 We use the pronon 'she' to refer to the lawyer and 'he' to refer to the client.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, interesting results are obtained when the costs of litigation are assumed to be a choice variable for the conflicting parties. De Mot et al (2013) analyze endogenous litigation expenditures, by using a rent-seeking model, and show that the optimal trial process (i.e. unitary or sequential) depends on the strength of the plaintiff's case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%