2006
DOI: 10.1519/00139143-200604000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Scores on Balance Screening Tests Associated with Mobility in Older Adults?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
13

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
31
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The underlying mechanisms controlling balance and mobility performance requires both static and dynamic balance (26). Indeed, our results indicate that training for standing balance using a wobble board may provide an advantage over treadmill walking in improving obstacle avoidance strategies for a novel task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underlying mechanisms controlling balance and mobility performance requires both static and dynamic balance (26). Indeed, our results indicate that training for standing balance using a wobble board may provide an advantage over treadmill walking in improving obstacle avoidance strategies for a novel task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A distinction between static and dynamic balance performance in community-dwelling older adults is supported by the finding that scores on static and dynamic balance tests are only moderately correlated. 36 Because static and dynamic tasks challenge different aspects of balance control, balance assessment should include performance under both types of conditions. Previous investigators have manipulated the interface between the foot and walking support surface in an attempt to improve balance and thereby to reduce the risk of falling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although muscle stiffening may be a useful mechanism for correction of small perturbations to balance, when excessive, such stiffening can produce inflexibility, which itself becomes difficult to control and has the potential to induce instability (Collins et al., 1995; Lauk et al., 1999). To the extent that measures of static posture are predictive of falling (Shubert et al., 2006; but see Baloh et al., 2003), dwelling in the early, open‐loop control system may put individuals at risk for falling by reducing their ability to take advantage of environmental information to enhance stability. Like older control men (Sullivan et al., 2006), alcoholic men were able to take advantage of sensory and stance aids to control sway even with open‐loop control; however, neither age nor history of alcoholism in men detectably affected posture regulation by closed‐loop control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%