2006
DOI: 10.1162/edfp.2006.1.3.287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Public Subsidies to Higher Education Regressive?

Abstract: This paper estimates the dollar amount of public higher education subsidies received by U.S. youth and examines the distribution of subsidies and the taxes which finance them across parental and student income levels. Although youths from highincome families obtain more benefit from higher education subsidies, high-income households pay sufficiently more in taxes that the net effect of the spending and associated taxation is distributionally neutral or mildly progressive. These results are robust to alternativ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(7 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most public expenditures on higher education-which nationally total more than $160 billion per year-occur at the state level in the form of aid to state colleges and universities as well as community colleges that helps keep tuition well below cost (Barrow et al, 2013). Many analyses of these expenditures suggest that these programs are relatively regressive, with the largest benefits being gained by higher-income families that send their children primarily to the flagship schools in state college and university systems (Barrow et al, 2013;Hansen and Weisbrod, 1969;Johnson, 2005).…”
Section: Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most public expenditures on higher education-which nationally total more than $160 billion per year-occur at the state level in the form of aid to state colleges and universities as well as community colleges that helps keep tuition well below cost (Barrow et al, 2013). Many analyses of these expenditures suggest that these programs are relatively regressive, with the largest benefits being gained by higher-income families that send their children primarily to the flagship schools in state college and university systems (Barrow et al, 2013;Hansen and Weisbrod, 1969;Johnson, 2005).…”
Section: Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier influential work includes Hansen and Weisbrod (1969), Pechman (1970) and Blaug (1987). Using National Longitudinal Survey of Youth data, Johnson (2006) analyses the distribution of net subsidies with respect to various definitions of parental income, child income and dynastic income. By each of these metrics, Johnson finds that American higher education subsidies are mildly progressive, with the top decile primarily subsidising the system and all other deciles experiencing positive or only slightly negative transfers.…”
Section: Overview Of Empirical Strategy and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study we follow most closely is Johnson (2006), which explores the distribution of net higher education subsidies in the United States. Earlier influential work includes Hansen and Weisbrod (1969), Pechman (1970) and Blaug (1987).…”
Section: Overview Of Empirical Strategy and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the oft‐stated objects of higher education subsidization is to extend opportunities to middle‐income and lower income households. Alternatively, some have argued that higher education subsidies are regressive (Johnson, ). If these efforts are successful to some degree in either direction, then the level of state higher education subsidization will influence the state's income distribution.…”
Section: Empirical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%