2014
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/788/2/l39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are (Pseudo)bulges in Isolated Galaxies Actually Primordial Relics?

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Durbala et al (2008Durbala et al ( , 2009) concluded that isolated galaxies are less clumpy, less concentrated, more symmetric, and may have larger bars than in samples of less isolated galaxies. In addition, these authors found that most AMIGA spirals host pseudobulges rather than classical bulges (see also Fernández-Lorenzo et al 2014). Other commonly-used non-parametric quantities are discussed by Andrae, Jahnke, and Melchior (2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Durbala et al (2008Durbala et al ( , 2009) concluded that isolated galaxies are less clumpy, less concentrated, more symmetric, and may have larger bars than in samples of less isolated galaxies. In addition, these authors found that most AMIGA spirals host pseudobulges rather than classical bulges (see also Fernández-Lorenzo et al 2014). Other commonly-used non-parametric quantities are discussed by Andrae, Jahnke, and Melchior (2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Their SDSS composite images confirm that these bulges are indeed blue rather than an artefact of our model fitting. The tail of bulge colours out to excessively red (g −i) colours has a less clear explanation; values as high as (g − i) 1.5 mag do not appear physically plausible (Fernández Lorenzo et al 2014;Mendel et al 2014;Kim et al 2016). These bulges are still likely to be some of the most red objects in the sample but our ability to derive a meaningful quantity is severely lessened in the regime where the bulge magnitudes in the g-band are significantly fainter than in the i-band.…”
Section: Separating Galaxy Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KIG 685 is classified as a peculiar elliptical (E + 0 pec T = −4) by Buta et al () (Table ), while Fernández Lorenzo et al () classified it E/S0, that is, slightly later in type ( T = −3). The total absolute magnitude, adopting the distance reported in Table , suggests that the galaxy is located at the bright end of the magnitude distribution of ETGs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We considered the classification provided by Fernandez‐Lorenzo and AMIGA collaborators ( Fernández Lorenzo et al ), HYPERLEDA and Buta et al (2019). KIG 685 is considered an elliptical by all three classifications, while KIG 895 has an uncertain classification: it is a spiral for Buta et al () and HyperLeda and a late S0/a for Fernández Lorenzo et al (). The large uncertainty in the classification, based on SDSS images, needs to be resolved via high spatial resolution images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation