2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-002-6204-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are postoperative complaints and complications influenced by different techniques in fashioning and fixing the mesh in transperitoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty? Results of a prospective randomized trial

Abstract: It is unknown at present what the best method is among mesh implantation, central incision, reconstructing the deep inguinal ring, or a non-incised mesh implant in laparoscopic hernia surgery. Further, it is unproven to what extent a circular enclosure of the cremasteric structures by an incised mesh implant could cause postoperative complications and complaints. To evaluate the possible effects of different configurations and fixation techniques of mesh implants in transperitoneal repair of inguinal hernias, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of studies that compare mesh repair with non-mesh repair with regard to postoperative pain, physical activity or early return to work and leisure activities show significantly better results for the tension-free techniques [3, 21,26,37]. However, it is important for one to notice that the difference between Shouldice and the open tension-free Lichtenstein technique is not as evident as that between Shouldice and laparoscopic repair [26,33,38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The majority of studies that compare mesh repair with non-mesh repair with regard to postoperative pain, physical activity or early return to work and leisure activities show significantly better results for the tension-free techniques [3, 21,26,37]. However, it is important for one to notice that the difference between Shouldice and the open tension-free Lichtenstein technique is not as evident as that between Shouldice and laparoscopic repair [26,33,38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Both open techniques, Shouldice and Lichtenstein, are associated with possible injury to peripheral nerve structures and scarring of the abdominal wall [25]. Nerve injury during laparoscopic hernia repair, especially to the nervus cutaneus femoris lateralis has also been reported, especially at the beginning of the laparoscopic repair era, but seems to be avoidable with the correct operating technique [21]. Tension-free techniques and especially laparoscopic repair, seem to be less painful in the early postoperative period [3, 12,26], but there is no evidence as to whether the presence of the prosthetic mesh itself may be the source of postoperative complaints [3,22,[27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, the protagonists of TEP are interpreting such a renunciation of fixation as an advantage of TEP over TAPP. Some comparative studies presented no fixation or suture fixation as an effective alternative especially for TAPP [25,43]. The reduced material, characteristic for the applied meshes in these studies, could generally also be of significance, as the average rate of recurrence in large patient groups is 1% or less (Tables 1 and 2), depending on the composition of the patient collective that is being investigated.…”
Section: Tapp Techniquementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Technical details of the TAPP technique were assessed in 12 studies but in only half of them could a relevant question be detected [11]. Similarly to TEP there are indications to use a non-incised mesh [25], which is fixed by most authors depending on the kind of hernia defect and probably also on the type of mesh used [26]. The peritoneal defect must be closed tightly following the placement of the mesh (e.g.…”
Section: Tapp Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%